Search for: "State v. C. S. S. B." Results 1401 - 1420 of 15,315
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
1 Nov 2022, 10:23 am by David Kopel
On May 19, 2022, Cornell penned an article castigating in advance the Supreme Court for being likely to uphold the right to bear arms in the case New York State Rifle & Pistol Association v. [read post]
1 Nov 2022, 5:01 am by Michael Geist
But Bill C-18’s dangerous approach ascribes value to links where there isn’t any, regulates which platforms must pay in order to perm [read post]
31 Oct 2022, 7:56 am by OTy9gYz
By Nina Rice* The history of New York’s statutory law pertaining to the art market is relatively brief despite the states long held status as the art capital of the United States, if not the world. [read post]
31 Oct 2022, 1:49 am by Jon L. Gelman
Here, the judge disqualified B&C based on a violation of R.P.C. 1.7, which states, in pertinent part, that "a lawyer shall not represent a client if the representation involves a concurrent conflict of interest. [read post]
30 Oct 2022, 5:54 pm by INFORRM
The letter claims Tesco’s loyalty program is illegal under UK GDPR, as it “entails extensive data collection and processing” and “infringes the principle of data minimisation set out in Article 5(C) of the UK GDPR. [read post]
30 Oct 2022, 1:20 pm by Giles Peaker
Lowe v Charterhouse (2022) EW Misc 8 (CC) A county court deposit penalty claim judgment, but well worth noting because a) a Circuit Judge decision by HHJ Luba KC, b) there are some broader points in application , and c) well it is quite the case. [read post]
30 Oct 2022, 5:18 am by Anastasiia Kyrylenko
This approach was not, however, maintained in the Design Regulation as finally adopted.EUIPO and Easy Sanitary Solutions appealed to the CJEU (Joined Cases C-361/15 P and C-405/15 P). [read post]
28 Oct 2022, 3:47 pm by Kalvis Golde
A list of this week’s featured petitions is below: O’Connor-Ratcliff v. [read post]
25 Oct 2022, 2:37 pm by Michael Lowe
  Texas Penal Code §20.05(c) states: It is an affirmative defense to prosecution of an offense under this section, other than an offense punishable under Subsection (b)(1)(A) or (b)(2), that the actor is related to the smuggled individual within the second degree of consanguinity or, at the time of the offense, within the second degree of affinity. [read post]