Search for: "State v. District Court" Results 1401 - 1420 of 72,632
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
30 Sep 2014, 9:35 am by Venkat Balasubramani
The Washington State Supreme Court accepted review, and arguments will be heard (in both cases) today. [read post]
17 Apr 2012, 6:47 am
Town of Leyard, the US District Court for the District of Connecticut addressed whether the Town of Leyard, Connecticut could impose its ad valorem property tax on slot machines that non-tribal vendors leased to the Mashantucket Pequot tribe. [read post]
22 Apr 2008, 11:05 pm
Not surprisingly, a Connecticut federal district court has dismissed a somewhat incoherent lawsuit brought by a pro se plaintiff against the United States and the U.S. [read post]
2 Dec 2022, 9:21 am by Allan Blutstein
(unpublished) -- affirming district court’s “well-reasoned” decision that plaintiff was not entitled to discovery and concluding that district court did not abuse its discretion by imposing filing sanctions on plaintiff and her attorney.Berk v. [read post]
16 Jul 2021, 8:45 am by Matthew L.M. Fletcher
Question presented: Is the Court of Indian Offenses of Ute Mountain Ute Agency a federal agency such that Merle Denezpi’s conviction in that court barred his subsequent prosecution in a United States District Court for a crime arising out of the same incident? [read post]
9 Aug 2018, 7:57 pm by Jeff Gittins
Haik then petitioned the district court to review the State Engineer's decision. [read post]
5 Feb 2019, 9:44 pm by Ben Allen
  The district court subsequently agreed and ordered that the state grant Mr. [read post]
Photo by Pixabay on Pexels.com By: Katie Haas In November 2019, the United States District Court for the District of Massachusetts ruled in Alasaad v. [read post]
22 Oct 2021, 4:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
In response to the District's informing retirees that it would no longer reimburse them for IRMAA surcharges, certain retirees [Plaintiffs] commenced a CPLR article 78 proceeding seeking [1] a court order annulling the District's decision, contending that the District's discontinuing such reimbursements violated Chapter 729 of the Laws of 1994 (as amended by Chapter 22 of the Laws of 2007), the State's Retiree Health Insurance… [read post]
22 Oct 2021, 4:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
In response to the District's informing retirees that it would no longer reimburse them for IRMAA surcharges, certain retirees [Plaintiffs] commenced a CPLR article 78 proceeding seeking [1] a court order annulling the District's decision, contending that the District's discontinuing such reimbursements violated Chapter 729 of the Laws of 1994 (as amended by Chapter 22 of the Laws of 2007), the State's Retiree Health Insurance… [read post]