Search for: "State v. German"
Results 1401 - 1420
of 3,001
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
2 May 2010, 3:42 am
And the German and Italian versions were different again. [read post]
14 Dec 2010, 8:35 pm
For example, Article 79 of the German Basic Law forbids any amendment that would change the protection afforded for human dignity (Article 1) or the democratic character of the German state (Article 20). [read post]
5 Jan 2012, 7:01 am
The lawsuit: Knox v. [read post]
17 Jul 2011, 4:00 am
Condor and Filvern v. [read post]
2 Dec 2020, 8:11 am
On Monday, the Supreme Court finally heard oral argument in Van Buren v. [read post]
8 Dec 2011, 4:14 pm
Justice Bergin stated: “That does not mean that the latter communications in the circumstances that pertained on this occasion were not relevant to or germane to the occasion. [read post]
29 Jun 2011, 1:14 am
(For an interesting case on this issue, see the famous US Sixth Court of Appeals decision in Mozert v. [read post]
13 Jun 2016, 12:49 pm
* BREAKING: CJEU says that fair compensation for private copying cannot be funded through general state budgetThe CJEU has considered the freedom of implementing the private copying exception, which may be broad but not so broad as to allow for fair compensation to be funded from the general state budget. [read post]
27 Sep 2020, 7:08 am
The case at issue was an opposition to an application of a mark combining the sign “V” with words “Valentino Rudi” by the Italian high end fashion company Valentino. [read post]
1 Feb 2013, 1:25 pm
To understand why the federal guidelines for drug offenses need to be revised, read Judge Gleeson’s full opinion in United States v. [read post]
22 Dec 2019, 9:33 am
But the particular way in which Qualcomm's reply brief makes that point is misleading:"See United States v. [read post]
28 May 2015, 8:12 am
This weblog has not been uniformly impressed with FIFA's intellectual property activities over the years (see eg "Fifa scandal: the sponsors awaken", here; "FIFA's unfair catenaccio on World Cup's IP", here; "Ferrero v FIFA (in the World Cup trade mark dispute) -- 1:0 says the German BGH", here; "Put those vuvuzelas away, here comes FIFA", here; "Pants off in Anti-Ambush Marketing Frenzy", here;… [read post]
13 Sep 2021, 11:55 am
(CSIRO) v. [read post]
28 Jun 2018, 6:30 am
From my vantage point, the reason Trump v. [read post]
23 Feb 2024, 7:30 am
Yet in Griswold v. [read post]
20 May 2011, 5:16 am
See Bauman v. [read post]
18 Oct 2022, 10:38 am
Then came OPPO, which after its withdrawal from the German market is not going to come under pressure soon--a nightmare for patentees--and which is also giving Nokia's world-class in-house and outside litigators a hard time:The first VoiceAge EVS v. [read post]
4 Aug 2010, 7:27 am
"As General McAuliffe stated to the Germans at Bastogne in December, 1944: 'Nuts! [read post]
30 Nov 2022, 6:36 am
"While the first Ericsson v. [read post]
5 Mar 2013, 8:52 pm
See Robert Bosch LLC v. [read post]
