Search for: "State v. Green" Results 1401 - 1420 of 6,119
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
1 Jul 2018, 10:00 pm
Supreme Court being held in a 7-2 decision (Justice Gorsuch and Chief Justice Roberts dissenting),Oil States Energy Servs. v. [read post]
3 Jul 2011, 8:23 am
(credit for map showing ICC members in green and signatories in gold) Yet relations between the 2 intergovernmental organizations have been tense, as discussed in posts available here. [read post]
28 May 2012, 9:07 am by INFORRM
The appeal by way of case stated in the “Twitter joke” case (Chambers v DPP) was heard on 8 February 2012 and judgment was reserved. [read post]
24 Nov 2021, 10:22 am
 "Where a valid cause of action is not stated, the party moving for judgment is not entitled to the requested relief, even on default" (Green v Dolphy Constr. [read post]
24 Jun 2011, 5:17 am by Susan Brenner
Green, supra (quoting People v. [read post]
8 Jun 2012, 9:00 am by Josh Sturtevant
Some Democrats might be happier in a labor, or socialist, or green party than under their current affiliations. [read post]
4 Jan 2013, 1:06 pm by Michael Steven Green
I’m posting an un- or underexplored question about Erie Railroad Co. v. [read post]
27 Nov 2023, 5:51 am by Elizabeth Goitein
” In fact, while four district court judges and the FISA Court have found backdoor searches to be constitutionally reasonable, four circuit court judges — including a unanimous Second Circuit panel in United States v. [read post]
3 Nov 2014, 4:39 am by Amy Howe
At ten a.m. today the Court will hear oral arguments in Zivotofsky v. [read post]
29 Aug 2024, 12:55 pm by Eric Goldman
In a mondo FN13 (over a page long), the majority expressly acknowledges: “this holding may be in tension with Green v. [read post]
9 Feb 2014, 5:49 am by Adam B. Cordover, Attorney-at-Law
United States Attorney General Eric Holder has announced policy changes in the wake of the landmark Supreme Court case of U.S. v. [read post]
16 Aug 2013, 1:49 pm by Bart Torvik
The Freakonomics guys say we can thank Roe v. [read post]