Search for: "State v. Jacobs"
Results 1401 - 1420
of 1,970
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
The SEC and Small Capital Formation: The Advisory Committee on Small and Emerging Companies (Part 1)
17 Feb 2012, 5:00 am
Catherine V. [read post]
16 Feb 2012, 3:41 pm
” See FCC v. [read post]
16 Feb 2012, 2:29 pm
Field, Coeur d'Alene Tribal Police, Benewah County Sheriff's OfficeVEHICLE #1 -------------DRIVER Jacob V. [read post]
14 Feb 2012, 10:45 am
Thomas Throne and Jacob T. [read post]
12 Feb 2012, 2:33 pm
Surveillance is of critical importance in the investigation of serious and organised crime, in determining the extent and patterns of criminal behaviour, and in the gathering of evidence to construct a case against a suspect; thus it has been described as one of the most important legal weapons deployed by the United States against Mafia groups and families (see Jacobs, Busting the Mob: United States v. [read post]
7 Feb 2012, 3:45 pm
Rose v. [read post]
27 Jan 2012, 2:21 pm
In distinguishing Windisman[28], Winkler J. had stated that in Sutherland the work of the RP was unnecessary to the preparation or presentation of the case. [read post]
26 Jan 2012, 7:26 am
United States, and Ryburn v. [read post]
25 Jan 2012, 2:43 pm
State regulation of air pollution fromoffshore ships is upheld in PacificMerchant Shipping Ass’n v. [read post]
18 Jan 2012, 7:16 am
In Florida, the case which states whether something is material is a matter for the trier of fact is Haiman v. [read post]
17 Jan 2012, 12:53 pm
By Jacob A.C. [read post]
16 Jan 2012, 10:00 pm
Certainly this reasoning is supported by the authorities cited by Floyd J at [85]-[89], to the effect that even though an invention is obvious to try, it is nonetheless obvious only if it is “more-or-less self-evident that what is being tested ought to work” (Lord Justice Jacob in St Gobain v Fusion Provida [2005] EWCA Civ 177 [35]) and there must be a “fair expectation of success” (Lord Hoffmann in Conor v Angiotech [2008] UKHL 49 [42].) [read post]
13 Jan 2012, 1:23 pm
McGee, or Jacobs & Young v. [read post]
12 Jan 2012, 5:00 am
Mr Vaid's presentation was called "Corporate Decision Making in IPR Protection and Enforcement"Mr Vaid is responsible for protecting the intellectual property rights of LVMH Fashion Group, which includes iconic brands such as LV, Marc Jacobs, LOEWE, CELINE, KENZO, Emilio Pucci and Berluti. [read post]
10 Jan 2012, 6:29 am
In Sackett v. [read post]
4 Jan 2012, 12:37 pm
Several Interesting per curiams rounded out 2011:In United States v. [read post]
4 Jan 2012, 4:00 am
Oxford University Press, 1999, v. 2 [read post]
26 Dec 2011, 3:00 am
Jacobs (N.D. [read post]
23 Dec 2011, 2:53 am
Professor Sir Robin Jacob (Speakers) and J. [read post]
20 Dec 2011, 4:13 pm
, Election Law Journal (forthcoming 2011) (draft available) Citizens United and the Orphaned Antidistortion Rationale, 27 Georgia State Law Review 989 (2011) (symposium on Citizens United) The Nine Lives of Buckley v. [read post]
