Search for: "State v. Long."
Results 1401 - 1420
of 51,467
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
27 Mar 2015, 8:12 am
This week, the United States Supreme Court issued a long-awaited ruling in Young v. [read post]
25 Jun 2013, 7:22 am
Cir.)Docket: Shelby County v. [read post]
6 Dec 2021, 6:12 am
In Hughes v. [read post]
20 Jul 2011, 1:00 pm
Though not expressly stated in the Order, it seems likely that Judge Rakoff was deferring the issuance of a fully-reasoned order until the Supreme Court’s issuance of its Dukes v. [read post]
2 Sep 2015, 9:32 am
My favorite example is the mockable claim in Reno v. [read post]
17 May 2018, 8:30 am
Sixty-four years after Brown, the world is again watching to see whether the United States will walk the walk of equality that it has talked about, but ignored, for so long. [read post]
24 Apr 2012, 6:09 am
In its recent decision in the case of Schiavone v. [read post]
10 Nov 2007, 7:28 am
" This ruling came in State v. [read post]
9 Mar 2018, 12:41 pm
Rick cites Davis v. [read post]
2 Mar 2010, 7:15 am
Continuing our series of five-minute podcasts on oral argument days, we have two new podcasts below with counsel in McDonald v. [read post]
12 Oct 2010, 9:46 am
In Bob Jones University v. [read post]
26 Mar 2009, 12:10 am
In Hermandad Y Asociados, Inc. v Movimiento Misionero Mundial, Inc., (NY Sup. [read post]
27 Mar 2009, 5:23 am
At Monday's oral argument in Yeager v. [read post]
2 May 2013, 10:51 am
As long as the parties have a concrete interest, however small, in the outcome of t he litigation, the case is not moot. [read post]
14 May 2022, 1:00 am
This revolutionary decision ended the long ban on states... [read post]
18 Jun 2013, 1:06 am
In Bullock v. [read post]
18 Jun 2013, 1:06 am
In Bullock v. [read post]
18 Jun 2013, 1:06 am
In Bullock v. [read post]
13 Oct 2011, 2:00 am
The law established by the United State Supreme court in Thomas v. [read post]
9 Apr 2019, 2:00 am
As Justice Scalia noted, the Supreme Court has long distinguished between failing to raise a substantial federal question for jurisdictional purposes, which is what Goosby addressed, and failing to state a claim for relief on the merits, which is what the District Judge held. [read post]
