Search for: "State v. Ruth"
Results 1401 - 1420
of 2,810
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
5 Oct 2016, 6:36 am
However, between its decisions in Ashe and Yeager, the court ruled in United States v. [read post]
4 Oct 2016, 5:15 am
United States and Shaw v. [read post]
28 Sep 2016, 12:24 pm
Humphrey in 1994 and Wallace v. [read post]
23 Sep 2016, 7:49 am
From July 19 to 23, Justice Alito, Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg, and retired Justice John Paul Stevens participated in a New York University Law School conference in Barcelona, Spain. [read post]
22 Sep 2016, 12:22 pm
The court has long recognized (in United States v. [read post]
20 Sep 2016, 8:05 am
” Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg’s dissent sharply disputed that statement, claiming it was not based on “reliable evidence. [read post]
19 Sep 2016, 4:00 am
, 60 New York Law School Law Review 493-516 (2015/16).Ruth C. [read post]
15 Sep 2016, 11:16 am
United States and Obergefell v. [read post]
15 Sep 2016, 5:42 am
In Cato at Liberty, Trevor Burrus and David McDonald argue that the Court should grant review in Foster v. [read post]
14 Sep 2016, 5:56 am
At the Notice and Comment blog, David Feder discusses Esquivel-Quintana v. [read post]
12 Sep 2016, 11:00 am
In his dissent in Lee v. [read post]
9 Sep 2016, 7:20 am
United States (1998, in which Justice Breyer wrote for the majority) that first advanced the constitutional theory adopted by the Court in Apprendi v. [read post]
8 Sep 2016, 11:12 am
In FEC v. [read post]
8 Sep 2016, 6:41 am
” At the National Law Journal (subscription or registration required), Tony Mauro reports on Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg’s recent announcement that she will speak next February at the Virginia Military Institute, the formerly all-male academy forced to admit women under Ginsburg’s majority opinion in United States v. [read post]
6 Sep 2016, 11:56 am
Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg made a thinly veiled speech about the backlash to Roe v. [read post]
2 Sep 2016, 7:30 am
For his Election Law Blog, Hasen predicts the Court will deny the stay, with at most two noted dissents from Justices Ruth Bader Ginsburg and Sonia Sotomayor. [read post]
31 Aug 2016, 11:07 am
In the 1973 decision of San Antonio Independent School District v. [read post]
31 Aug 2016, 7:53 am
The Ricci v. [read post]
30 Aug 2016, 1:25 pm
Vera and Shaw v. [read post]
30 Aug 2016, 12:31 pm
Three dissenting Justices (Stephen Breyer, Ruth Bader Ginsburg, and David Souter) argued that the law burdened many voters, and it was not justified by any state interest, given that the state failed to prove the law was necessary to prevent voter fraud or promote public confidence in the election process. [read post]
