Search for: "State v. Saide"
Results 1401 - 1420
of 57,160
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
27 Jan 2013, 12:46 pm
In a major victory for marijuana rights in California, the state supreme court has declined to hear an appeal from prosecutors on the overturned conviction of a marijuana collective operator in People v. [read post]
15 Dec 2018, 4:31 pm
It is generally accepted that the more a decision lies in the “macro-political” field the less intrusive will be the court’s supervision (R v Secretary of State for Education, ex p. [read post]
23 May 2011, 1:00 pm
ARTICLE V The contracting Parties shall not be bound to delivery up their own citizens or subjects under the stipulations of this treaty. [read post]
30 Jun 2022, 1:30 pm
The Dobbs v. [read post]
17 Jun 2019, 9:01 pm
The first was New York v. [read post]
12 Jun 2018, 5:05 am
United States [docket]. [read post]
16 Dec 2023, 10:31 am
There's much to be said about that decision, both legally and politically. [read post]
14 Nov 2015, 8:29 am
The case, Wittman v. [read post]
25 Jun 2018, 8:16 am
In Wayfair v. [read post]
15 Nov 2010, 11:47 am
"We have repeatedly held that 'federal habeas corpus relief does not lie for errors of state law,'" the Court said, citing its 1991 decision in Estelle v. [read post]
14 Jan 2010, 9:04 am
The United States Supreme Court Tuesday reinstated the death penalty sentence for Frank Spisak's 1982 shooting spree at Cleveland State University, overturning a Sixth Circuit Court of Appeals ruling in October 2006. ( Decision ) "(The Sixth Circuit)," the Court said, "erred in holding that the instructions and forms contravened Mills v. [read post]
23 Jul 2004, 6:01 am
A ruling by the Minnesota Court of Appeals could allow up to 400 prisoners to challenge their sentences, possibly forcing the state to impanel juries for sentencing hearings, state officials said. [read post]
18 Jun 2018, 7:47 am
Plaintiffs in Benisek v. [read post]
24 Aug 2016, 5:20 am
Senate President Thomas V. [read post]
25 Jun 2018, 8:16 am
In Wayfair v. [read post]
25 Jun 2018, 8:16 am
In Wayfair v. [read post]
14 Jun 2010, 12:35 pm
J.R.A. v. [read post]
26 Feb 2010, 5:00 am
The warning said: You have the right to remain silent. [read post]
18 Aug 2016, 8:24 am
The case, U.S. v. [read post]
29 Oct 2015, 7:18 am
In their ongoing court challenge to the rule, regulators from Massachusetts and Montana argued that the SEC’s amendments to Regulation A violate the plain meaning of the Securities Act, overstep the Commission’s delegated authority, and strip investors of valuable state law protections (Lindeen v. [read post]
