Search for: "Taking Offense v. California" Results 1401 - 1420 of 1,481
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
29 May 2008, 7:00 am
Prosecutors, like judges, must be free to do their jobs without fear of being sued later, the high court said in the case of Imbler v. [read post]
27 May 2008, 9:50 am
The Ninth Circuit erred in holding that "the maximum term of imprisonment ... prescribed by law" must be determined without taking recidivist enhancements into account. [read post]
3 May 2008, 3:01 pm by James Peters
These employers think that even if the wife makes twice as much as her husband, she should quit her job to raise the children.A more poignant way of expressing this can be found in Knussman v. [read post]
25 Apr 2008, 10:00 am
"Products Liability is generally considered a strict liability offense. [read post]
21 Apr 2008, 11:52 am
" Consequently, a state drug offense punishable by more than one year qualifies as a "felony drug offense," even if state law classifies the offense as a misdemeanor. [read post]
18 Apr 2008, 8:46 am
Concluding the court wasn't ready to overturn Gregg v. [read post]
17 Apr 2008, 7:10 am
Take it to the appellate court.... [read post]
16 Apr 2008, 1:15 pm
The case out of California, Marketing Information Masters v. the Board of Trustees of California State University reaches a rather predictable result in dismissing an allegation of copyright infringement on the grounds that states and state institutions are immune from lawsuits by private individuals and corporations. [read post]
31 Mar 2008, 12:01 am
Supreme Court's decision in Medellin v. [read post]
31 Mar 2008, 12:01 am
Supreme Court's decision in Medellin v. [read post]