Search for: "United States Court of Appeals Third Circuit" Results 1401 - 1420 of 7,492
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
16 Jun 2012, 10:40 am
The consumer appealed the Marx decision to the United States Supreme Court, and on May 29, 2012, the Supreme Court granted certiorari (that is, the court agreed to hear the appeal). [read post]
24 Jan 2011, 9:56 am by Kent Scheidegger
  Third Circuit opinion rejecting the challenge is here. [read post]
Case date: 24 February 2021 Case number: No. 19-3388 Court: United States Court of Appeals, Sixth Circuit A full summary of this case has been published on Kluwer IP Law. [read post]
9 Mar 2018, 12:30 pm by John K. Ross
No need to reach that, says two-thirds of a Seventh Circuit panel; he didn't assert the proper claims against the appropriate people to be in federal court. [read post]
6 Mar 2013, 11:00 am
The United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit reversed, accepting the SEC’s argument that because the underlying violations sounded in fraud, the “discovery rule” applied, meaning that the statute of limitations did not begin to run until the SEC discovered or reasonably could have discovered the fraud. [read post]
30 Jul 2009, 9:41 pm
  One might justify what the Court did in Marschalk as stemming from the same pressures that led to the quick and decisive resolution of the Iranian claims isssue that prompted Dames & Moore itself, but in the typical case, a "GVR" in light of the new decision seems right on.Same, too, with the most recent well-known effort by a court of appeals to have the Supreme Court answer a certified question -- the en banc Second… [read post]
6 Dec 2013, 10:51 am by Gregg Fisch
  However the Fifth Circuit noted that this specific position already had been rejected by the United States Supreme Court in AT&T Mobility v. [read post]
13 Jul 2018, 9:38 am by Jonathan I. Nirenberg
In a recent opinion, the Third Circuit Court of Appeals ruled that an employer’s failure to promote an employee was not legally actionable discrimination where the employer promoted the same individual to the same job approximately one month later. [read post]
13 Jul 2018, 9:38 am by Jonathan I. Nirenberg
In a recent opinion, the Third Circuit Court of Appeals ruled that an employer’s failure to promote an employee was not legally actionable discrimination where the employer promoted the same individual to the same job approximately one month later. [read post]
2 Jan 2022, 4:01 pm
  Foreign Sovereign Immunities Act Comity       Appeals from the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York Nos. 18-cv-8248, 18-cv-11167. [read post]