Search for: "United States v. Choice"
Results 1401 - 1420
of 6,611
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
30 Mar 2011, 4:10 am
In United States v. [read post]
4 Mar 2012, 11:34 am
United States v. [read post]
15 May 2012, 9:35 am
These individuals will have no choice but to file a standalone waiver. [read post]
23 Jan 2023, 3:43 am
In this post, Ross Ludlow, Legal Support Assistant at Matrix Chambers, comments on the case of R v Maughan (Northern Ireland) [2022] UKSC 13. [read post]
7 Feb 2013, 5:38 am
United States, __ A.3d __ (D.C. 2013), the defendant was taken into custody under suspicion of having robbed an elderly woman. [read post]
19 May 2020, 11:50 am
” Denan v. [read post]
18 Jun 2019, 1:32 pm
The discretionary function exception applies if a foreign state was making a choice or judgment that involved social, economic or political policy. [read post]
29 Apr 2013, 4:20 pm
” On April 3, 2013 the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia (Cacheris, J.) issued a summary a judgment ruling that is sure to call into question many teaming agreements that opted for a Virginia choice of law provision. [read post]
23 Sep 2009, 3:41 am
V. [read post]
23 Aug 2008, 7:30 am
Both Mike at C&F and Eugene at VC have posted about Judge Bybee's 9th Circuit decision in United States v. [read post]
9 Jul 2009, 3:50 pm
/**/ United States v. [read post]
6 Oct 2022, 9:15 am
Among the tens of thousands of tattooers working in the United States, the tiny handful who have brought copyright infringement claims are rare outliers. [read post]
28 Aug 2014, 5:00 am
See Gupta v. [read post]
26 May 2018, 9:28 am
(Ask yourself if the United States could reinstitute slavery by adding a new amendment proposed and ratified in accordance with the procedures set out in Article V.)Still, the obvious question is whether such determinations are better made by ostensible "experts," whether in law, philosophy, or whatever, or by "we the people" engaging in what Publics might have called 'reflection and choice" about an issue of fundamental… [read post]
27 Jun 2017, 11:52 am
This conclusion only makes sense if the states face a binary choice for how to interpret IQ scores, which is not the case. [read post]
21 Aug 2017, 6:21 am
We have previously written in this space about the United States Supreme Court’s decision in Integrity Staffing Solutions, Inc. v. [read post]
11 Dec 2009, 8:13 am
This is a policy choice implicit in the Act itself. [read post]
4 Mar 2024, 5:56 pm
Pix credit here In a 53 page opinion, the United States District Court for Northern Alabama has ruled, in National Small Business Association v. [read post]
13 Feb 2018, 4:16 am
United States, which involves the effect of the dual-officeholder ban on military judges. [read post]
24 Jun 2010, 10:14 am
Moreover, these differences represent legitimate policy choices and sovereign interests that ought to be respected by the United States. [read post]
