Search for: "United States v. Classic" Results 1401 - 1420 of 1,755
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
1 Sep 2012, 10:40 am
However, in the case of Grande v. [read post]
7 Dec 2009, 6:00 am by Maxwell Kennerly
United States et al., Civil Action 02-2010, United States District Court for the District of Columbia. [read post]
28 May 2023, 9:38 am by John Floyd
    This exception was evidenced by a May 10, 2023 decision, United States v. [read post]
27 Aug 2010, 9:46 am
The Third Circuit observed that statements plaintiffs identified here were akin to those at issue in Institutional Investors Group v. [read post]
2 Nov 2009, 1:41 am
Morgan Contract Furniture resolves design right infringement claim against PTT Design (Class 99) United States US General Disney: Is it about contents, distribution, or branding? [read post]
2 Nov 2009, 1:41 am
Morgan Contract Furniture resolves design right infringement claim against PTT Design (Class 99) United States US General Disney: Is it about contents, distribution, or branding? [read post]
2 Nov 2009, 1:41 am
Morgan Contract Furniture resolves design right infringement claim against PTT Design (Class 99)   United States US General Disney: Is it about contents, distribution, or branding? [read post]
15 Jul 2011, 8:15 am by Marty Lederman
" This dictum about public "persua[sive]" speech later became the basis for the indictment -- which the district court refused to dismiss on First Amendment grounds -- in United States v. [read post]
12 Dec 2010, 7:42 am
Now we need new hands to help carry the message of how valuable Bayh-Dole is to the continued health and wealth of the United States. [read post]
19 Dec 2011, 4:03 pm by INFORRM
  For over 200 years, not only in the United States but also in England, most people are deeply suspicious of any order of that kind. [read post]
20 Aug 2012, 11:19 am by Barry Friedman
What enduring value does Alexander Bickel’s now-classic The Least Dangerous Branch have today? [read post]
8 Jul 2014, 9:35 am
The European Union and the United States voted against the resolution, which they thought counter-productive and polarizing; both stated that they would not participate in the treaty negotiating process.[5] Japan and South Korea also voted no. [read post]