Search for: "United States v. Doe" Results 1401 - 1420 of 40,129
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
17 Jun 2014, 7:27 am by Ruthann Robson
Professor Ruthann Robson, City University of New York (CUNY) School of Law Over a dissent from Justice Scalia, joined by Thomas, the United States Supreme Court decided not to review the closely watched Elmbrook School District v. [read post]
26 Jun 2019, 8:22 am by Alex Nealon
John and Jane Does 1-100 United States District Court for the Northern District of California filed on June […] [read post]
19 May 2008, 6:30 am
On Friday, the United States Solicitor General urged the court to refuse to hear Exxon Mobil, et al., v. [read post]
6 Apr 2016, 8:00 pm by John Ehrett
United States 15-1140 Issue: Whether a defendant may be convicted of federal criminal fraud when the purported victim has suffered no loss of tangible property, but has instead only been deprived of the intangible “right to control” with whom it does business. [read post]
16 Jun 2014, 9:00 am by Gerry W. Beyer
Rameker, The Supreme Court of the United States found that under the bankruptcy code inherited IRAs are not “retirement funds. [read post]
16 Mar 2017, 8:25 pm by Kate Howard
The petition of the day is: Doe v. [read post]
7 Feb 2008, 3:51 am
Adam Gershowitz, a professor at the South Texas College of Law explores this in his recent article, The iPhone Meets the Fourth Amendment and so does the Northern District of Georgia in United States v. [read post]
14 Jun 2019, 3:23 pm by Ruthann Robson
Professor Ruthann Robson, City University of New York (CUNY) School of Law In its opinion in Jane Doe v. [read post]
5 Apr 2007, 10:50 am
The Second Circuit has held that requiring felons convicted of nonviolent crimes and sentenced to probation to supply a sample of their DNA for analysis and storage in a federal database does not violate the Fourth Amendment.The decision in United States v. [read post]
31 Aug 2017, 3:18 pm by Aurora Barnes
United States 17-250 Issue: Whether the Due Process Clause excuses the government’s knowing use of false testimony where the government does not also suppress evidence indicating that the testimony was false. [read post]
6 Sep 2007, 1:18 am
The Second Circuit has held that the exlusionary rule doe not apply to 18 U.S.C. 3109, a statute that empowers federal officers to break into a house to execute a search warrant after being refused admission.The decision in United States v. [read post]
21 Nov 2006, 4:54 am
The piece, from Gregory Germain (Syracuse) has this abstract: Does Congress have the power under the United States Constitution to tax compensatory personal injury awards? [read post]
10 Sep 2010, 10:00 am by Patrick McKinney
Insurance Company of the State of Pennsylvania: Does a proceeding before the United States Department of the Interior Board of Contract Appeals constitute a “suit” such as to trigger insurance coverage under a commercial general liability policy? [read post]
20 Apr 2011, 3:29 am
Contracting out a negotiating unit's work Vestal Employees Asso., NEA/NY v Vestal CSD, 94 N.Y.2d 409 Management may attempt to “contract out” work claiming that to do so is more efficient or less expensive or because the tasks are “too technical” for its employees to perform. [read post]