Search for: "United States v. Heard" Results 1401 - 1420 of 8,389
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
19 Feb 2021, 1:36 am by CMS
  On 15 December 2020, the Supreme Court heard the parties’ submissions in the case of General Dynamics United Kingdom Limited v State of Libya. [read post]
14 Feb 2021, 4:45 pm by INFORRM
On 10 February 2021 Nicklin J heard an application in the case of BHX v GRX Media Law in Other Jurisdictions Australia In the case of Ogbonna v. [read post]
12 Feb 2021, 11:53 am by Philip Bobbitt
There is a rather fey textual argument I have heard that runs like this: Of course you can disqualify someone who is not a civil officer of the United States. [read post]
11 Feb 2021, 9:01 pm by Vikram David Amar
As the letter from this Wednesday states, “[a]fter reconsideration of the issue, it is now the position of the United States that the amended section 5000A is constitutional” and “it is also now the position of the United States that, if [the] Court nevertheless concludes that Section 5000A is unconstitutional, that provision is severable from the remainder of the ACA. [read post]
11 Feb 2021, 2:35 pm by Josh Blackman
As President Trump notes, one of the articles of impeachment [Article 10] charged President Johnson with insulting and denouncing Congress by "mak[ing] and declar[ing] … certain intemperate, inflammatory, and scandalous harangues … [which] are peculiarly indecent and unbecoming in the Chief Magistrate of the United States. [read post]
10 Feb 2021, 12:48 pm by Jonathan H. Adler
After reconsideration of the issue, it is now the position of the United States that the amended Section 5000A is constitutional. [read post]
7 Feb 2021, 4:53 pm by INFORRM
United States Bloomberg had a piece “Fox News Faces $2.7 Billion Lawsuit Over Voting Machine Fraud Claims”. [read post]
6 Feb 2021, 8:10 am by Russell Knight
    All laws of a public nature enacted by any state or territory of the United States. [read post]
3 Feb 2021, 5:31 am by Joel R. Brandes
Inasmuch as Family Court did not afford petitioner adequate notice and opportunity to be heard on the matters, Family Court’s vacatur of the December 2019 amended order and dismissal of the petitions raised serious due process concerns and, [read post]
3 Feb 2021, 5:27 am by Joel R. Brandes
Inasmuch as Family Court did not afford petitioner adequate notice and opportunity to be heard on the matters, Family Court’s vacatur of the December 2019 amended order and dismissal of the petitions raised serious due p [read post]
31 Jan 2021, 4:13 pm by INFORRM
On 26 January 2021, the trial of case of Kim v Lee was heard by Steyn J. [read post]
27 Jan 2021, 11:16 pm by Kevin
The idea that a private company would decide what is free speech and what is not protected free speech under the United States Constitution seems pretty far fetched. [read post]
27 Jan 2021, 2:06 am by Jan von Hein
A so-called draft Treaty on Business and Human Rights (“Legally binding instrument to regulate, in international human rights law, the activities of transnational corporations and other business enterprises”) is currently being prepared by an Open-ended intergovernmental working group on transnational corporations and other business enterprises with respect to human rights, established in 2014 by the United Nation´s Human Rights Council. [read post]