Search for: "United States v. North" Results 1401 - 1420 of 5,467
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
17 May 2022, 12:09 pm by Phil Dixon
Where the legislative change to North Carolina’s system of determining substantial similarity of out of state reportable sex convictions occurred after the district court granted summary judgment to the plaintiff and in response to that relief, the plaintiff was the prevailing party entitled to attorney fees Grabarczyk v. [read post]
4 May 2009, 7:21 pm
Over the centuries, many have sought better opportunities in the United States. [read post]
26 Dec 2023, 2:17 pm by Jonathan H. Adler
Even if Minnesota claimed that pollution emitters in North Dakota were harming the state, Minnesota couldn't hale the North Dakota emitters to court. [read post]
3 Aug 2022, 11:12 am by Amy Howe
University of North Carolina and Students for Fair Admissions v. [read post]
29 Jun 2011, 6:34 am by John Elwood
United States, 10-7515, for United States v. [read post]
12 May 2025, 6:50 am by Alex Phipps
The court noted that the Fourth Circuit had revisited this issue post-Bruen in United States v. [read post]
14 Mar 2010, 12:30 pm by John Buford
  Further complicating matters, shortly after filing the Business Court lawsuit, Plaintiffs filed a separate lawsuit in the Western District of North Carolina, Carter v. [read post]
17 Jul 2012, 7:36 am by Mark S. Humphreys
The United States 5th Circuit Court of Appeals issued an opinion in 2012, that dealt with policy interpretation of the word "use" in the context of the insurance policy. [read post]
20 Aug 2008, 3:10 am
From the abstract: This Article presents newly discovered archival evidence demonstrating that government lawyers told a crucial lie to the United States Supreme Court in the case of Hirabayashi v. [read post]
21 Mar 2018, 4:31 pm by Ronald Mann
The tone of Hawkins’ argument was set three sentences into his presentation, when Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg interrupted to ask pointedly: “Is it not the case that no other political entity would be immune from such a quiet-title suit, not the United States, not a state of the United States, not a foreign government? [read post]