Search for: "United States v. Paul"
Results 1401 - 1420
of 4,492
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
4 Oct 2009, 1:14 pm
" Section 215 would amend the ’33 Act, the ’34 Act and the Investment Advisors Act of 1940 to specify that U.S. courts could properly exercise jurisdiction in any action involving "conduct with the United States that constitutes significant steps in furtherance of violation, even if the securities transaction occurs outside the United States and involves only foreign investors," as well "conduct… [read post]
21 Oct 2018, 2:43 pm
Sarnoff, BIO v. [read post]
5 Jun 2020, 6:00 am
Paul (1992), Planned Parenthood v. [read post]
21 Jan 2010, 3:45 pm
If anything, the decision in Citizens United v. [read post]
9 Jun 2020, 6:01 am
Paul (1992), Planned Parenthood v. [read post]
25 May 2018, 12:21 pm
McGraw Hill et al, was then heard on Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Arizona. [read post]
8 Oct 2008, 10:41 pm
The complaint was filed in the face of many decisions of federal courts in the United States holding that a non-commercial "gripe" site about a trademark holder may use a domain name in the form www.trademark.com so long as the site itself is not confusing about whether it is sponsored by the trademark holder. [read post]
18 Jun 2021, 10:21 am
Becerra, a case currently in front of a United States District Court that centers on whether a provision of the Affordable Care Act that requires insurance providers to cover certain services and medicines without cost-sharing is unconstitutional, and contends that there is a good chance that part of the law will be struck down. [read post]
27 Dec 2017, 11:19 am
Keller on behalf of STATE OF TEXAS (Keller, Scott) (Entered: 11/28/2017)11/28/201711 MOTION for Leave to File Brief of Amici Curiae by STATE OF TEXAS, STATE OF WEST VIRGINIA, STATE OF ALABAMA, STATE OF ARKANSAS, STATE OF GEORGIA, STATE OF LOUISIANA, STATE OF OKLAHOMA, STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit Proposed Brief of Texas et al., # 2 Text of Proposed Order)(Keller,… [read post]
27 Dec 2017, 11:19 am
Keller on behalf of STATE OF TEXAS (Keller, Scott) (Entered: 11/28/2017)11/28/201711 MOTION for Leave to File Brief of Amici Curiae by STATE OF TEXAS, STATE OF WEST VIRGINIA, STATE OF ALABAMA, STATE OF ARKANSAS, STATE OF GEORGIA, STATE OF LOUISIANA, STATE OF OKLAHOMA, STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit Proposed Brief of Texas et al., # 2 Text of Proposed Order)(Keller,… [read post]
12 Jan 2008, 2:37 am
It should be read from cover to cover by everyone who is interested in the scope of copyright law in the United States. [read post]
24 May 2012, 6:33 am
At Reason, Jacob Sullum discusses the questions about the constitutionality of warrantless electronic surveillance left open by United States v. [read post]
28 Nov 2007, 8:49 pm
United States v. [read post]
19 Dec 2007, 12:44 am
DISTRICT COURTSOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORKCriminal Practice
Sex Offender Annual Address Registration Law Does Not Violate Commerce Clause of Constitution
United States v. [read post]
1 Jul 2010, 2:18 pm
Paul, MN 55101 RE: State of Minnesota v. [read post]
19 Nov 2009, 1:38 pm
United Mine Workers of America. [read post]
28 Sep 2021, 8:35 am
My thanks to Paul Santa Cruz, Archivist, from the George W. [read post]
29 Mar 2021, 6:30 pm
The United States government has passed two measures in an effort to address the issues Covid has introduced. [read post]
9 Feb 2023, 5:53 am
A couple of months ago, I was asked to work on an amicus brief focusing on the treaties made between the Navajo Nation and the United States with a couple of other people. [read post]
14 Apr 2008, 8:28 am
Forty-four years have passed since any criminal in the United States was executed for a crime in which the victim was not killed. [read post]
