Search for: "United States v. Younge" Results 1401 - 1420 of 3,944
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
17 Oct 2007, 2:22 pm
In response to Scott Dodson’s piece on Bowles v. [read post]
9 Apr 2015, 5:49 am
Code makes it a crime, among other things, tobring[] into the United States . . . or knowingly use[] any express company or other common carrier or interactive computer service (as defined in section 230(e)(2) (! [read post]
19 Feb 2013, 6:03 am by Sarah Erickson-Muschko
Young, a case scheduled for argument tomorrow in which the Court will consider challenges under the Privileges and Immunities Clause and the dormant Commerce Clause to a state law restricting access to public records by out-of-state residents. [read post]
Ali, a United States citizen, flew to Egypt last September to bring home to America his wife of four years, Marwa, and their young daughter, Mariam. [read post]
15 Mar 2007, 12:40 pm
On appeal Miller argues that the state appellate court unreasonably concluded that McShane's performance at sentencing was not deficient or prejudicial, and he further contends that United States v. [read post]
24 Aug 2016, 9:52 am by Beth Graham
  The court added that United States Supreme Court arbitration jurisprudence states substantive rights cannot be waived in arbitration agreements. [read post]
19 Jul 2011, 11:33 am by Eugene Volokh
”It is debatable whether a false statement, standing alone, lacks any First Amendment protection, as discussed at length by the majority and dissenting opinions in United States v. [read post]
24 Feb 2015, 4:13 am by Amy Howe
At the Ogletree Deakins blog, Hera Arsen discusses Young v. [read post]
6 Dec 2016, 10:35 am by Florian Mueller
It has taken the Supreme Court of the United States less than two months since a mid-October hearing and less than ten pages (counting only the opinion per se, not the two-page syllabus) to determine and explain that the United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit got the law on design patent damages fundamentally wrong. [read post]
23 Apr 2020, 10:41 am by Peter Margulies
§ 1182(f) of the Immigration and Nationality Act (INA), which authorizes the president to bar entry of foreign nationals “detrimental to the interests of the United States”—the same provision that Trump used for his travel ban, which the Supreme Court upheld in Trump v. [read post]