Search for: "Vessels v. State" Results 1401 - 1420 of 1,596
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
26 Aug 2021, 6:30 am by Guest Blogger
  (As Tyler observes, I sometimes describe controversies as based on state law, as they often are today. [read post]
7 Nov 2024, 7:52 am
They preserve the revolution precisely by transposing the revolutionary performance from outside the constitutional state (and thus a threat to it) to become a method, a performance of the revolutionary trajectories now in the service of constitutional stability, or at least solidity. [read post]
14 Dec 2024, 9:00 am by Gene Takagi
“Terrorist Activity” as defined in section 1182(a)(3)(B) any activity which is unlawful under the laws of the place where it is committed (or which, if it had been committed in the United States, would be unlawful under the laws of the United States or any State) and which involves any of the following: (I) The highjacking or sabotage of any conveyance (including an aircraft, vessel, or vehi [read post]
  The Court stated that a term will only be implied if it satisfies the case of “business necessity” or it is “so obvious that it goes without saying”. [read post]
21 Mar 2024, 5:02 am by Beatrice Yahia
Sahil Kapur and Frank Thorp V report for NBC News. [read post]
3 Nov 2011, 6:00 am by John Dehn
by John Dehn There is much to be analyzed in the Ninth Circuit’s en banc decision in Sarei v. [read post]
21 Jun 2011, 7:21 pm by Big Tent Democrat
When discussing the Bush Administration's claim of unfettered Presidential power as Commander in Chief, "liberals" would cite the various opinions in Youngstown v. [read post]
14 Jul 2011, 1:18 am by Alasdair Henderson
Third, where the use of force by a State’s agents operating outside its territory bring an individual under the control of the State’s authorities, and thereby into its jurisdiction (the examples given here involve Issa v. [read post]
27 Dec 2014, 2:19 am by Ben
More from Europe: In Case C-355/12 Nintendo v PC Box the CJEU said that circumventing a protection system may not be unlawful. [read post]
14 Dec 2007, 1:00 am
,SwitzerlandSwitzerland to introduce regulation for patent attorneys: (BLOG@IP::JUR)United Kingdom2007 Annual IP Crime Report released by UK-IPO: (BLOG@IP::JUR), (IAM)Patents Act 2004 (Commencement No. 4 and Transitional Provisions) Order 2007 has been published in order to put in place the final batch of changes to the UK Patents Act 1977 made by the Patents Act 2004: (IPKat)United StatesUnited States Supreme Court to clarify patent exhaustion doctrine in… [read post]