Search for: "W. T. SMITH" Results 1401 - 1420 of 1,604
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
5 Jun 2009, 2:52 am
A federal court judge in Wisconsin has rejected a request by Smith Barney to order financial advisers who now work for Robert W. [read post]
4 Jun 2009, 2:54 pm
Smith and the Kerry campaign are correct, it wouldn’t be the first time the IRS screwed up. [read post]
4 Jun 2009, 6:15 am
Krouner, 267 A.D.2d 575, 699 N.Y.S.2d 220 (3d Dep’t 1999), which, although brief, is rife with errors (noted in red in the following quotation from the opinion): By this proceeding, petitioner Leonard W. [read post]
3 Jun 2009, 2:20 pm
" According to Whitney Smith, the campaign received an IRS Notice on January 7, 2008, stating that the IRS was missing W-2 forms from them. [read post]
24 May 2009, 9:15 pm
Yang Cheng Fu  taught t'ai chi to Cheng Man Ch'ing, who taught Robert W. [read post]
23 May 2009, 3:43 am
City of Chicago, No. 08-974 - T VIISee issue description (+briefs links) at SCOTUSblogo SCOTUS docket hereo Noted here: SCOTUSblog (w/ brief links and noting that the Court has invited the views of the SG)2nd CircuitDuffett v. [read post]
22 May 2009, 7:45 am
He tried to claim that other computer scientists such as Ted Selker, Douglas W. [read post]
18 May 2009, 10:25 am
  “[I]t has long been recognized that in order to accommodate the collective bargaining process, certain concerted activity among and between labor and employers must be held to be beyond the reach of the antitrust laws. [read post]
11 May 2009, 4:54 am
Since Doe doesn't have probable cause to search the car under the vehicle exception, the only way he can search it is if Smith consents.So Doe says to Smith, & [read post]
8 May 2009, 10:08 am by SC Divorce and Disabilty
Smith, 327 S.C. 448, 463, 486 S.E.2d 516, 523-24 (Ct. [read post]
3 Apr 2009, 9:35 am
Before explaining the court's analysis, I can't refrain - as a New Yorker - from pointing out that this beautifully and clearly written opinion by Justice Mark Cady stands as a strong rebuke to the bizarre plurality opinion produced by Judge Robert Smith of the New York Court of Appeals in the 2006 ruling in Hernandez v. [read post]