Search for: "Williams v. United States" Results 1401 - 1420 of 6,000
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
6 Jul 2015, 8:32 pm by Florian Mueller
A few years too many for Oracle, which wants this resolved, but not for Google, which never went out of its way to accelerate anything here.On Monday afternoon local time, Judge William Alsup of the United States District Court for the Northern District of California, who once compared this case to the "World Series of IP cases", did the equivalent of a soccer referee blowing the whistle when the second half starts. [read post]
6 Oct 2010, 12:20 pm
The Snyders are supported by a number of Veteran's organizations, by 48 states and the District of Columbia, and by a bipartisan group of nearly half the United States Senate. [read post]
11 Jul 2011, 11:52 am by Sheppard Mullin
On June 20, 2011, the United States Supreme Court decided Wal-Mart Stores, Inc. v. [read post]
14 Jun 2017, 3:15 am by Scott Bomboy
Two historical groups added “to the flag of the United States of America. [read post]
13 Dec 2016, 4:04 am by Edith Roberts
United States, a bank-fraud case, rejecting Lawrence Shaw’s argument that he could not be found liable under the federal bank-fraud statute if he only intended to defraud a third party, not the bank itself, and remanding for consideration of questions about the jury instructions. [read post]
30 Sep 2021, 7:53 am by Jason Rantanen
If a foreign defendant has assets in the United States and a U.S. judgment can be enforced in the United States, bypassing The Hague Convention does not matter. [read post]
8 Nov 2010, 9:19 am by CSL Library News
Solicitor General, judge and vice president of the United States. [read post]
16 Jun 2020, 6:57 am by Lisa Larrimore Ouellette
Guest post by Jake Linford, Loula Fuller and Dan Myers Professor, Florida State University College of Law, whose trademark law scholarship I have highlighted on JotwellI want to thank Lisa Ouellette for inviting me to blog about United States Patent & Trademark Office v. [read post]