Search for: "As v. State"
Results 1421 - 1440
of 235,619
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
5 Mar 2013, 2:36 pm
United States. [read post]
4 Feb 2013, 3:06 pm
United States. [read post]
27 Mar 2013, 12:17 pm
In the second of the same-sex marriage cases, after yesterday's Proposition 8 argument, the Court heard oral argument today in United States v. [read post]
15 Aug 2017, 9:00 am
Relying on State v. [read post]
18 Jul 2018, 8:08 am
United States on SSRN. [read post]
16 Jun 2020, 9:01 pm
United States, and United States v. [read post]
22 May 2008, 4:43 am
R (G) v Nottinghamshire Healthcare NHS Trust [2008] EWHC 1096 (Admin); R (N) v Secretary of State for Health; R (B) v Nottinghamshire Healthcare NHS Trust; [2008] WLR (D) 162 “A provision which had the effect of prohibiting smoking in a high security psychiatric hospital was not incompatible with the human rights of detained mental patients and was not unlawful. [read post]
28 May 2008, 1:15 am
Regina (G) v Nottingham Healthcare NHS Trust; Regina (N) v Secretary of State for Health; Regina (B) v Nottingham Healthcare NHS Trust Queen’s Bench Divisional Court “Preventing detained mental patients from smoking was not a breach of article 8, right to respect for private and family life, or article 14, prohibiting discrimination, of the European Convention on Human Rights. [read post]
13 Sep 2022, 4:30 am
United States, the U.S. [read post]
18 Jan 2012, 6:07 pm
Here is a link to the hearing page for United States v. [read post]
3 Jun 2009, 10:35 am
United States v. [read post]
16 Jul 2012, 4:52 pm
On June 25, 2012, the Supreme Court of the United States granted certiorari in Vance v. [read post]
29 Aug 2008, 8:12 am
Joyce v Secretary of State for Health Queen’s Bench Division “Where a care worker challenged a finding of misconduct which had resulted in her being placed by the Secretary of State for Health on a list of those considered unsuitable to work with vulnerable adults, the Care Standards Tribunal was entitled, on appeal, to consider allegations of misconduct not entertained by the secretary of state, provided it acted fairly. [read post]
1 Mar 2018, 11:19 am
The United States v. [read post]
15 Jul 2011, 2:54 am
St Prix v Secretary of State for Work and Pensions [2011] EWCA Civ 806; [2011] WLR (D) 226 “A Union citizen who, when within the United Kingdom, ceased to work in circumstances other than those set out in paragraphs (a) to (d) of article 7(3) of the Citizenship Directive was not a ‘worker’ entitled to the relevant ‘right of residence’ for the purposes of article 7(1)(a) of the Directive; and pregnancy had deliberately been… [read post]
18 Jul 2012, 3:37 am
Adedoyin v Secretary of State for the Home Department: [2012] EWCA civ 939; [2012] WLR (D) 206 “Where the Upper Tribunal had properly directed itself as to its approach on an appeal from a determination of the First–tier Tribunal and had arrived at a conclusion which was open to it, the decision of the Upper Tribunal contained no material error of law and so the Court of Appeal should not allow an appeal from that decision, even if the court… [read post]
28 Jan 2009, 4:01 am
State v. [read post]
17 Nov 2011, 8:05 pm
V. was at Axis/Radius nightclub in Scottsdale when a fight broke out. [read post]
10 Nov 2014, 6:09 pm
in a criminal case in Connecticut (State v. [read post]
24 Jan 2022, 8:54 am
In State v. [read post]
