Search for: "B. Michael Roberts" Results 1421 - 1440 of 1,671
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
28 Feb 2009, 9:28 am
There is other good stuff on the topic: you can't go far in this literature without discovering Michael Ybarra's Washington Gone Crazy, on the career of Pat McCarran; Robert P. [read post]
24 Feb 2009, 4:12 am
, Teaching Fellowship FORDHAM & Research and Teaching Fellowship YALE (Robert Cover Fellowship) CLEVELAND STATEJonathan P. [read post]
23 Feb 2009, 1:10 pm
Illinois’ solicitor general, Michael A. [read post]
1 Feb 2009, 7:03 am
Other books have been referenced in the past years (See my post of Sept. 9, 2008:.Richard B. [read post]
31 Jan 2009, 12:13 pm
Washington Reports Congressman Kendrick Meek - Congress Kendrick B. [read post]
24 Jan 2009, 3:14 pm
Skakun III Misbehaving Attorneys, Angry Judges, and the Need for a Balanced Approach to the Reviewability of Findings of Misconduct Robert B. [read post]
17 Jan 2009, 9:57 am
Originalism and Regulatory Takings: Why the Fifth Amendment May Not Protect Against Regulatory Takings, But the Fourteenth Amendment May by Michael B. [read post]
3 Jan 2009, 6:35 am
Lambda Legal intervened in the case on behalf of spouses Michael Sabatino and Robert Voorheis, who had been married out of state and reside in Westchester County, and thus stood to benefit from the Order and to suffer harm if it was overturned. [read post]
27 Dec 2008, 10:19 am
. * 1063: Béla I of Hungary died when his throne’s canopy collapsed. * 1135: Henry I of England is said to have died after gorging on lampreys, his favorite food. * 1219: According to legend, Inalchuk, the Muslim governor of the Central Asian town of Otrar, was captured and killed by the invading Mongols, who poured molten silver in his eyes, ears, and throat. * 1258: Al-Musta’sim was killed during the Mongol invasion of the Abbasid Caliphate. [read post]
23 Dec 2008, 6:52 pm
See also the comments from Arnold and Porter (Robert Pitofsky and Michael Sohn) and the ABA (James Wilson). [read post]
20 Dec 2008, 7:23 am
If nothing is done, the property owner will be fined 150 dollars and the city will remove it.The TV news story about the new ordinance demonstrates a bizarre disconnect where the city council's punitive view toward graffiti is misplaced toward property owners, who as crime victims are not given the least consideration:Councilors Michael Smith and Dorothy Roberts-Burns wanted the fee to be lowered from 50 dollars to 25. [read post]