Search for: "BANKS v. CALIFORNIA" Results 1421 - 1440 of 3,051
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
3 Feb 2010, 12:07 pm by R. Grace Rodriguez, Esq.
The foreclosure took place in violation of specific terms the Forebearance Agreement.In typical fashion, Aurora attempted to defend the action by claiming that the California Foreclosure Prevention Act is completely preempted by Federal Law governing mortgages and banks. [read post]
16 Sep 2024, 12:19 pm by Will Yeatman
Bank of America, involving a New York law that was nearly identical to the California statute at issue in Lusnak and Kivett I. [read post]
30 Apr 2018, 4:08 am by Edith Roberts
Last week’s oral argument in in Trump v. [read post]
11 Mar 2018, 5:30 pm by INFORRM
Kerr, University of Southern California Gould School of Law GDPR and the Internet of Things: Guidelines to Protect Users&rsqu [read post]
29 May 2013, 7:51 am by Allison Trzop
National Australia Bank. [read post]
14 Feb 2012, 5:26 am by Alison Rowe
            Paul Husband, an equine tax attorney based in California, will be contributing a series of guest posts over the next few weeks on the 2011 tax opinion, Van Dusen v. [read post]
19 Apr 2016, 2:52 pm by Barbara S. Mishkin
Mishkin Since it was filed in a California federal court in July 2012, we have been following CFPB v. [read post]
5 Mar 2015, 2:56 pm by John Elwood
Concepcion, the Supreme Court held that the FAA preempted California’s so-called Discover Bank rule, which conditioned the enforceability of consumer arbitration agreements on the availability of classwide arbitration. [read post]