Search for: "Billings v. Illinois" Results 1421 - 1440 of 1,767
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
7 Mar 2022, 9:18 am by fjhinojosa
Beyer’s article Estate Planning Ramifications of Obergefell v. [read post]
21 Feb 2021, 11:24 pm by Peter S. Lubin and Patrick Austermuehle
By 2015, the law firm hired by Sterling had prepared a preliminary memorandum on potentially fraudulent billing practices. [read post]
2 Jan 2020, 10:49 am by Brett Holubeck
  The House of Representatives has approved a bill to give 12 weeks of paid parental leave to federal workers and President Trump has shown support for the bill. [read post]
12 Nov 2015, 3:36 pm by D. Daxton White
Dax White is the managing partner of the White Law Group, a national securities fraud, securities arbitration and investor protection law firm with offices in Chicago, Illinois and Vero, Beach Florida. [read post]
18 May 2009, 5:24 am
’ (China Law Blog)   Europe ECJ finds similar marks on wine and glasses not likely to cause confusion: Waterford Wedgewood plc v Assembled Investments (Proprietary) Ltd, OHIM (Class 46) (IPKat) AG Colomer opines in Maple leaf trade mark battle: joined cases American Clothing Associates SA v OHIM and OHIM v American Clothing Associates SA (IPKat) (Excess Copyright) CFI: Restitutio and time limits: how does the law stand now for CTMs? [read post]
20 Mar 2016, 5:05 pm by INFORRM
Graham Smith has published his tweets about the draft bill on his cybereagle blog. [read post]
6 Oct 2009, 9:00 am
You can separately subscribe to the IP Think Tank Global Week in Review at the Subscribe page: [duncanbucknell.com]   Highlights this week included: $388 million verdict against Microsoft overturned (Ars Technica) (IP Law Observer) Briefs filed at US Supreme Court in Bilski v. [read post]
26 May 2020, 8:00 am by FHH Law
Filers that submit Form 395 can satisfy this requirement by completing Section V of Form 395 and need not submit a separate report. [read post]
5 Mar 2014, 4:21 pm by Robert B. Milligan
Massachusetts, Michigan, Illinois, New Jersey, Maryland, Minnesota, and Connecticut considered bills that would provide certain limitations on non-compete agreements but they were not adopted. [read post]