Search for: "Boring v. State" Results 1421 - 1440 of 1,714
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
21 Mar 2011, 3:57 pm by Andrew Dat
You see UCLA is a public college, meaning that it not only receives a large chunk of its funding from the state of California, but under National Collegiate Athletic Association v. [read post]
13 Nov 2018, 9:30 pm by David B. Kopel
In 2003, an Illinois bill for which then-state senator Barack Obama voted would have outlawed all firearms with a bore diameter larger than .50 inch. [read post]
4 Jan 2012, 4:31 pm by Paul Karlsgodt
  However, she pointed to what she considers a negative trend in the U.S. courts to exclude foreign investors from the forum, a trend culminating in the Supreme Court’s decision in Morrison v. [read post]
12 Sep 2011, 9:29 pm by Erik Gerding
And I am fond of saying that the boring issues are (A) where the bodies are buried and (B) where crises fester. [read post]
28 Mar 2018, 9:30 pm by Raphael Murillo
In response to the dramatic expansion of the Spanish Crown during Emperor Charles V’s reign, elites in the court and the Emperor himself typically employed inspections as a means of collecting records and reports. [read post]
11 Dec 2007, 12:48 am
  He also worked closely with Mississippi Attorney General Jim Hood in lawsuits against State Farm. [read post]
10 Jan 2012, 10:14 am
This position is to be contrasted with other jurisdictions such as the United States which has varying degrees of protection for personality rights and the right of publicity at state level. [read post]
10 May 2019, 6:30 am by Frank Pasquale
Indeed, we are only beginning to get a glimpse of how truly terrible it may turn out to be....The United States is, I believe, in the most precarious position since 1860.... [read post]
30 Jun 2023, 5:48 am by Rebecca Tushnet
If European legislator wanted to open spaces for startups, the best thing you can do is make established broad services as boring as they can be to make space for niche services. [read post]
12 Sep 2013, 4:17 pm by Stephen Bilkis
Article 6 of the Civil Rights Law provides a formal procedure for changing a name, which provides the advantages of being speedy, definite and a matter of record as was done in Smith v United States. [read post]