Search for: "California v. Scott"
Results 1421 - 1440
of 1,545
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
19 Sep 2008, 6:00 pm
: (Ars Technica), Google, GE join forces for green tech research, lobbying: (Ars Technica), AIPPI Congress: how to protect you IP rights in virtual worlds (Managing Intellectual Property), Industry still wary of ICANN plan for new top-level internet domains: (Intellectual Property Watch), Ubuntu-Firefox EULA dustup reignites OSS licensing debate: (Ars Technica), Media standard backers attempt Apple-less solo run: (Out-Law), Open Source in Mobile conference: OpenMoko CEO says embrace fragmentation,… [read post]
15 Sep 2008, 10:09 pm
To my surprise, California was not such a negative outlier in release practices. [read post]
15 Sep 2008, 12:30 pm
Villegas v. [read post]
12 Sep 2008, 2:33 pm
: Nine v IceTV: (International Law Office) Benelux Some new rules of the Director-General of the Benelux Organisation for Intellectual Property with regard to trade mark filings refused on absolute grounds and withdrawal of oppositions: (Class 46) Brazil Brazil exports agricultural technology to developing world: (IP tango) Canada Conservatives website faces claims of copyright infringement: (Michael Geist), Canada’s trade mark opposition practice… [read post]
11 Sep 2008, 1:12 am
Under Omega v. [read post]
27 Aug 2008, 5:02 pm
See, e.g., Scott v. [read post]
25 Aug 2008, 1:00 pm
And to add a little humor factor, Lowering the Bar discusses Knights Templar v. [read post]
23 Aug 2008, 1:23 am
You can separately subscribe to the IP Thinktank Global week in Review at the Subscribe page: [duncanbucknell.com] Highlights this week included: DRM for streaming music dies a quiet death: (Electronic Frontier Foundation), (Techdirt) CAFC decides Apotex and Impax infringed AstraZeneca’s Prilosec patents: (Law360), (Patent Prospector), (Patent Docs), (GenericsWeb), CAFC upholds lower court’s decision finding USPTO was within its rights to subject a Cooper patent to… [read post]
21 Aug 2008, 4:08 pm
Maybe not anymore - if the theory of this California case is adopted in other jurisdictions: This excellent article is a must read: "Barred by Lunatics Law: How a preexisting substituted judgment order can preclude posthumous challenges to a will in California (and possibly elsewhere): the lesson of Murphy v. [read post]
9 Aug 2008, 1:50 am
You can separately subscribe to the IP Thinktank Global week in Review at the Subscribe page: [duncanbucknell.com] Highlights this week included: The end of William Patry’s blog: (Patry Copyright Blog), (Excess Copyright), (Patently-O), (Chicago IP Litigation Blog), (Michael Geist), (The Fire of Genius), (Techdirt), (Patry Copyright Blog), Kitchin J clarifies scope of biotech patents, in particular gene sequence patents: Eli Lilly & Co v Human Genome Sciences:… [read post]
8 Aug 2008, 1:28 am
The Court stated that California state courts have not embraced the Ninth Circuit’s narrow restraint exception and stated “no reported California state court decision has endorsed the Ninth Circuit’s reasoning, and we are of the view that California courts have been clear in their expression that section 16660 represents a strong public policy of the state which should not be diluted by judicial fiat” (citing Scott… [read post]
7 Aug 2008, 5:30 pm
Both Scott v. [read post]
7 Aug 2008, 6:38 am
Chase, a former Treasury Secretary under Lincoln during the Civil War, for having wrongly decided Texas v. [read post]
31 Jul 2008, 12:07 am
We're the government, and we're here to copy - Blueport Co. v. [read post]
22 Jul 2008, 12:25 am
California as well. [read post]
15 Jul 2008, 1:45 am
Crime and Consequences reports that (according to this New York Times article), "85 Republican members of the House of Representatives have requested that the Supreme Court reconsider its decision in Kennedy v. [read post]
13 Jul 2008, 9:00 pm
Klem v. [read post]
10 Jul 2008, 4:16 am
" (Gregg v. [read post]
28 Jun 2008, 11:06 pm
Scott, D. [read post]
20 Jun 2008, 4:46 pm
California is here, via Oyez. [read post]
