Search for: "Clinton v. Clinton"
Results 1421 - 1440
of 3,308
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
19 May 2009, 4:11 am
For instance, the Supreme Court fundamentally restructured federal sentencing law through its 2005 decision in United States v. [read post]
31 May 2012, 12:22 pm
In Gill v. [read post]
20 Jan 2012, 1:40 pm
“V”;74. 2010 Mercedes-Benz ML63 AMG, VIN WDC1641772A608055, LicensePlate No. [read post]
3 Mar 2009, 5:59 pm
DOMA, as I’ve posted about before, is a federal law enacted during the Clinton Administration that says that states do not have to recognize other’s state’s same-sex marriage. [read post]
21 Jan 2009, 4:01 pm
On top of this, with the FTC v. [read post]
13 Jan 2012, 4:00 pm
Just yesterday, a Ninth Circuit panel rejected this argument in Bowers v. [read post]
19 Jul 2007, 3:22 pm
Ronald Krotoszynski analyzes the importance of culture to the Morse v. [read post]
2 Aug 2011, 2:26 pm
Prior to any jury trial, including this of Gamsen v. [read post]
30 May 2012, 5:00 pm
You may recall that the case, Gill v. [read post]
15 Jun 2012, 10:10 am
" Habeas is denied if the state appellate court's deferential review of the trial court is at least reasonable.Briggs v. [read post]
30 Jul 2007, 10:11 pm
Fred Thompson] as someone we could work with" and gave to his campaigns, but they can't be pleased by his kind words for Texas malpractice-suit curbs [Washington Post, Lattman; disclaimer] Pace U. student arrested on hate crime charges after desecrating Koran stolen from college [Newsday; Volokh, more; Hitchens] Little-used Rhode Island law allows married person to act as spouse's attorney, which certainly has brought complications to the divorce of Daniel and Denise Chaput from… [read post]
19 Sep 2007, 9:00 pm
Battaglia (a past Clinton-era Maryland U.S. [read post]
25 Sep 2014, 8:49 am
My own views are summed up in this post: Holder v. [read post]
15 Feb 2008, 8:49 pm
NY Times: McCain v. [read post]
23 Jun 2023, 9:26 am
It was a great look at how these affect our practice from both sides of the "v". [read post]
21 Aug 2007, 9:59 am
To name a few: the Republican party’s desire to have a high profile candidate to go up against Obama or Clinton; the never-ending quest to keep September 11 at the forefront of voters’ minds; and the lack of a strong anti-choice candidate who has resonated with the voters (yet). [read post]
10 Aug 2012, 5:58 am
In other words, polls are not foolproof; it is impossible to know what is going to happen in an election until it happens, and sometimes not even until some time after (see Bush v. [read post]
21 Jul 2017, 8:34 am
Ltd. v. [read post]
23 Jun 2013, 7:16 am
Let’s start with United States v. [read post]
16 Nov 2021, 9:56 am
From Stevens v. [read post]
