Search for: "Commonwealth v. Person, S."
Results 1421 - 1440
of 2,384
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
15 Aug 2011, 11:25 am
See Commonwealth v. [read post]
28 Jan 2019, 10:17 am
Commonwealth, 416 Mass. 142, 146 (1993); Cruz v. [read post]
6 Jan 2020, 7:53 am
Commonwealth v. [read post]
24 Jun 2016, 7:47 am
To convict the defendant of carrying a dangerous weapon, the Commonwealth would have to prove the following beyond a reasonable doubt: (1) that the item involved in a dangerous weapon; (2) that the defendant carried the item on his person; and (3) that the defendant knew that he was carrying the item on his person. [read post]
16 Apr 2015, 6:40 pm
The court noted that the jury would first address the merits of the Plaintiff’s personal injury claims and render a verdict on the liability and damages issues. [read post]
2 Apr 2012, 9:44 am
Even if V just says “I’ll kill you,” D must flee; that might not play as much into V’s hands (if V’s goal is really to kill D and not just chase him away), but it will still help V exercise unresisted power over D. [read post]
31 Oct 2012, 2:52 pm
Commonwealth v. [read post]
10 Sep 2007, 10:39 am
Evidently, the Commonwealth uses some scoring system to big the worst offenders:"You see, Virginia's version of the SVPA contained a super-crunching innovation. [read post]
6 Aug 2023, 6:38 am
Kirpans in Queensland On Tuesday, in Athwal v State of Queensland [2023] QCA 156, the Supreme Court of Queensland made a declaration that s 51(5) (Possession of a knife in a public place or a school) of Queensland’s Weapons Act 1990 was inconsistent with s 10 of the Commonwealth’s Racial Discrimination Act 1975 and therefore unconstitutional under s 109 of the… [read post]
29 Aug 2016, 1:53 pm
” (Batson v. [read post]
23 Dec 2011, 4:42 am
Commonwealth Mktg. [read post]
9 Nov 2015, 7:09 am
Here’s one example:[W]e conclude that a person acts in an intentional disregard of the rights of the plaintiff if the person acts with a purpose to disregard the plaintiff's rights, or is aware that his or her acts are substantially certain to result in the plaintiff's rights being disregarded. [read post]
2 Jul 2009, 9:30 am
Might as well try this: The defendant lastly contends that the electricity and the gas sold by NSTAR do not constitute “property”… Commonwealth v. [read post]
13 Oct 2015, 10:02 pm
Schwartz v Philadelphia Zoning Board of Adjustment, 2015 WL 5601248 (PA Commonwealth 9/24/2015)Filed under: Current Caselaw, Family, Student Housing [read post]
10 Feb 2012, 11:31 am
Appellant’s Brief, Slavoski v. [read post]
13 Jun 2016, 5:34 am
For the reasons that follow, defendants' motion to dismiss will be allowed and plaintiff's motion for sanctions will be denied.Padmanabhan v. [read post]
7 May 2018, 9:41 am
The Commonwealth appealed. [read post]
15 Feb 2018, 6:23 am
This issue was recently addressed in D & R Construction v WCAB. [read post]
28 Apr 2013, 11:10 pm
In Commonwealth v. [read post]
13 Jun 2010, 12:16 pm
Tech Inc. v. [read post]
