Search for: "Court of Appeals for the 7th Circuit" Results 1421 - 1440 of 4,876
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
26 Apr 2017, 6:34 am by Jeffrey Karek
Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit recently held that two debt collectors were entitled to demand payment for both principal amounts owed and interest under Wisconsin law. [read post]
24 Apr 2017, 1:00 pm by Adam Doerr
Second, appeals would go directly to the North Carolina Supreme Court, bypassing the Court of Appeals. [read post]
21 Apr 2017, 4:59 am by John Elwood
Court of Appeals for the 4th Circuit reversed. [read post]
20 Apr 2017, 8:45 am by Kate Howard
Courts of Appeals for the 7th and 11th Circuits. [read post]
19 Apr 2017, 4:47 am by Jon Hyman
As the circuits take sides on this issue, it becomes more and more likely that a losing party will appeal to the Supreme Court, which will be tempted to resolve this issue. [read post]
15 Apr 2017, 12:21 pm
Court of Appeals for the 7th Circuit 2011). [read post]
14 Apr 2017, 1:13 pm by Rachel Adams Ladeau
Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit ruled that the family of a woman murdered by her Home Depot supervisor at a family event could proceed against her former employer(s) on a theory of negligent supervision, hiring, and retention. [read post]
10 Apr 2017, 7:00 am
On April 7th, the Fourth Circuit overturned Gavin Grimm's win from last year, based on the Supreme Court's decision last month not to hear the case. [read post]
8 Apr 2017, 3:52 pm by David Bernstein
Court of Appeals for the 7th Circuit, sitting en banc, held that Title VII’s prohibition of discrimination based on sex should be interpreted to include a prohibition of discrimination based on sexual orientation. [read post]
7 Apr 2017, 7:30 am by David Bernstein
 Ivy Tech Community College, the 7th Circuit Court of Appeals, sitting en banc, held that Title VII’s prohibition of discrimination based on sex should be interpreted to include a prohibition of discrimination based on sexual orientation. [read post]
6 Apr 2017, 11:20 am by Christopher P. Hahn
Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit recently affirmed the dismissal of a borrower’s lawsuit against his mortgagee, its former employees, counsel and appellate counsel, and the original mortgagee’s software platform creator, under various federal and state consumer protection statutes and common law torts. [read post]
6 Apr 2017, 8:44 am by Holland & Hart
So ruled the majority of federal judges for the Seventh Circuit Court of Appeals on April 4, 2017. [read post]
6 Apr 2017, 6:48 am by Kate McGovern Tornone
With its “landmark” ruling, the U.S. 7th Circuit Court of Appeals upended three decades of precedent and set up the issue for review by the U.S. [read post]
5 Apr 2017, 9:25 am by James A. Burns, Jr. and Adam Weiner
Until yesterday, every federal appeals court to consider the issue—including the Seventh Circuit itself—had held that Title VII did not prohibit sexual orientation discrimination. [read post]
5 Apr 2017, 8:14 am
"7th Circuit rules that civil rights laws protect LGBT employees from workplace bias": Holly V. [read post]
5 Apr 2017, 5:28 am
Yesterday, the Seventh Circuit Court of Appeals issued an opinion: "we conclude today that discrimination on the basis of sexual orientation is a form of sex discrimination. [read post]
5 Apr 2017, 3:00 am by Howard Friedman
In an important decision handed down yesterday, the U.S. 7th Circuit Court of Appeals sitting en banc held in an 8-3 decision that under title VII of the 1964 Civil Rights Act, discrimination on the basis of sexual orientation is a form of sex discrimination. [read post]
4 Apr 2017, 6:35 pm by Sabrina I. Pacifici
On April 4, 2017 the Seventh Circuit Court of Appeals ruled (en banc) that Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 covers employees based on their sexual orientation… this case may be a battle ground for a Supreme Court case on LGBT rights. [read post]
3 Apr 2017, 7:58 am by Hector E. Lora
Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit recently reversed a trial court’s grant of class certification and remanded the case with instructions to dismiss the case with prejudice because the plaintiffs lacked standing to sue, having shown no injury in fact as required under Spokeo, Inc. v. [read post]