Search for: "Doe Defendants I through V" Results 1421 - 1440 of 12,261
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
16 Jan 2014, 6:31 am by Howard Wasserman
A few thoughts on personal jurisdiction following Tuesday's decision in Daimler v. [read post]
1 Oct 2023, 3:03 pm by Larry
In a 1984 decision called Jarvis Clark Co. v. [read post]
11 Oct 2007, 9:57 pm
The Appellate Division restated the public policy that: [T]his State favors " individuals ordering and deciding their own interests through contractual arrangements'" (Van Kipnis v Van Kipnis, __ AD3d __, 2007 NY Slip Op 06074, *5 [July 12, 2007], quoting Bloomfield v Bloomfield, 97 NY2d 188, 193 [2001]), and thus, duly executed prenuptial agreements, including agreements executed in a foreign country, are accorded the same presumption of legality… [read post]
20 Mar 2014, 12:28 pm by emagraken
Similarly, the fact that her examination for discovery only took place shortly before the trial does not appear to have been through any fault of the defendant. [32]         Having said this I do accept that receiving two different offers, which replaced an earlier offer, in close succession and without any explanation, late on the Friday before the week in which the trial started, had the prospect to confuse and be… [read post]
25 Aug 2023, 4:27 pm
Because even if I lived in Santa Clara county (which I don't), I'd have to admit during voir dire that I have already come to a tentative -- but fairly strong -- opinion that at least certain people in the Santa Clara County Sheriff's Office are totally and completely corrupt, and should be in prison.The defendant here is Apple's head of global security, Thomas Moyer. [read post]
30 Sep 2017, 1:48 pm by Paul Kish
 He wanted to continue his fight against this particular law up through the appellate courts. [read post]
30 Sep 2017, 1:48 pm by Paul Kish
 He wanted to continue his fight against this particular law up through the appellate courts. [read post]
23 Nov 2012, 10:35 pm by Kruttika Vijay
The defendants update their subscribers with the score and fall of wickets through text messages (SMSes). [read post]
2 Jul 2018, 6:14 pm by Eric Goldman
In what I think it the key part of the plurality opinion, the plurality concludes that it does (emphasis added): With the removal order, plaintiffs seek to overrule Yelp’s decision to publish the three challenged reviews. [read post]