Search for: "Does 1-54" Results 1421 - 1440 of 3,413
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
17 Jul 2017, 6:00 am by Colby Pastre
”[1] But human beings have always treated death as a matter of the greatest consequence. [read post]
17 Jul 2017, 5:05 am by Thomas G. Heintzman
The four judges who dissented held that the arbitrator erred on Question 1. [read post]
15 Jul 2017, 8:42 am by Jim Gerl
Doe ex rel Doe 611 F.3d 888, 54 IDELR 275 (DC Cir 7/6/10) DC Circuit ruled that HO did not exceed his authority where he reduced a disciplinary suspension. [read post]
13 Jul 2017, 7:06 am by Yosie Saint-Cyr
Reg. 35/08 came into force in September 2008 but does not apply to accidents prior to September 1, 2008. [read post]
8 Jul 2017, 12:21 pm
  Those differences can be reduced (in this case at least) to two fundamental issues: (1) the way that facts are weighed and balanced; (2) the basic assumptions about the role of the investor in the face of norms that must be enforced. [read post]
4 Jul 2017, 4:38 am by Romano Beitsma
The appeal is against the decision of the Examining Division refusing European patent application No. 06 790 328.6 (published as WO 2007/041767) on the ground that claim 1 of the sole request lacked novelty within the meaning of Articles 54(1) and (2) EPC.II. [read post]
2 Jul 2017, 8:06 am by Omar Ha-Redeye
, 1992 CanLII 102 (SCC), [1992] 1 S.C.R. 986, at p. 999; Jadot v. [read post]
28 Jun 2017, 3:22 pm by Arthur F. Coon
  Conspicuously, it does not argue that Sierra Club fails to meet the standards for publication. [read post]
28 Jun 2017, 4:47 am by Roel van Woudenberg
Indeed, claim 1 does not comprise any technical feature characterizing the "reference voltage generation circuit" other than by the fact that it is located within the sensor holder and by the fact that it supplies a "reference voltage" to a sensor. [read post]
26 Jun 2017, 3:31 am by Peter Mahler
The 54-page decision by a Minnesota state court judge in Lund v Lund, Decision, Order & Judgment, No. 27-CV-14-20058 [Minn. [read post]
26 Jun 2017, 3:31 am by Peter Mahler
The 54-page decision by a Minnesota state court judge in Lund v Lund, Decision, Order & Judgment, No. 27-CV-14-20058 [Minn. [read post]
21 Jun 2017, 8:14 am by Joy Waltemath
The term also means (1) any agent of such a person, and (2) a State or political subdivision of a State and any agency or instrumentality of a State or a political subdivision of a State, and any interstate agency, but such term does not include the United States, or a corporation wholly owned by the Government of the United States. [read post]
20 Jun 2017, 4:49 am by Matthias Weller
After the CJEU decided the first two cases dealing with Art. 13 EIR and detrimental acts in 2015 – Lutz (C-557/13) and Nike (C-310/14) – an Italian case (Vynils Italia SpA, C-54/16) concerning Art. 13 is still pending before the CJEU. [read post]
19 Jun 2017, 11:42 pm by Roel van Woudenberg
Novelty (Article 54 EPC)2.1 The opposition division considered the subject-matter of claim 1 of the main request to be known from D4.2.1.1 The first embodiment shown in figure 1 of document D4 is a field device reporting the temperature of a medium 3 flowing in a tube 2. [read post]
19 Jun 2017, 8:57 am by Paul Willetts
Section 54 of the Ontario Employment Standards Act requires that employers in the province must provide either notice or pay in lieu of notice, up to a maximum of 8 weeks, if they dismiss an employee (except in cases of serious employee misconduct). [read post]
18 Jun 2017, 4:00 am by Administrator
Save for exceptions, an unconditional release on an undertaking is the default position when granting release: s. 515(1). [read post]
15 Jun 2017, 3:49 am by Guest Contributor
EU Member States were given until 1 January 2010 to achieve compliance with the NOx thresholds; however, Member States were also allowed to apply for a five-year extension to 1 January 2015 (an Article 22 Extension) “where the limit values for [NOx] cannot be achieved” by 2010 (Article 22(1) of the AQD). [read post]
9 Jun 2017, 6:30 am by Nico Cordes
D7 ist daher für den erteilten Anspruch 1 Stand der Technik gemäß Artikel 54(2) EPÜ.1.3 In ähnlicher Weise wie das Streitpatent beschäftigt sich D7 mit Emulgatorzusammensetzungen, die eine hohe Säurestabilität aufweisen und somit die Emulgierung von Lebensmittelfarbstoffen ermöglichen (Absatz [0006]). [read post]