Search for: "Downs v. Jones" Results 1421 - 1440 of 2,144
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
9 Nov 2011, 6:08 am by David Oscar Markus
As her argument was winding down, Justice Elena Kagan leaned forward and asked: “Ms. [read post]
9 Nov 2011, 5:46 am
Jones, the GPS Fourth Amendment Case by Orin Kerr: I was at the Supreme Court this morning for the oral argument in United States v. [read post]
8 Nov 2011, 3:58 pm by nflatow
But at what point that reasoning breaks down is the question the justices considered today. [read post]
8 Nov 2011, 11:12 am by Lyle Denniston
The argument in the much-anticipated case of U.S. v. [read post]
6 Nov 2011, 3:35 pm by Eric
Another Nevada judge, this time Judge Jones, dismisses a Righthaven case for lack of standing [read post]
4 Nov 2011, 9:03 pm by Lyle Denniston
Jones — came in the case of U.S. v. [read post]
4 Nov 2011, 5:15 pm by INFORRM
Whether this would be wise will depend on the circumstances, but given that the Tesla case confirms that the principles set out in Jameel v Dow Jones [2005] QB 946 and Lait v Evening Standard [2011] EWCA Civ 859 apply equally to malicious falsehood claims, there would have to be good reasons for not suing on the original – particularly if your own actions in the interim suggest that you have not suffered any damage. [read post]
2 Nov 2011, 5:50 pm by INFORRM
In its recent judgment in Joined Cases C-509/09 and C-161/10 eDate Advertising GmbH v X and Olivier Martinez v MGN Ltd (25 October 2011), the Grand Chamber of the Court of Justice of the European Union has laid down a radical new rule of jurisdiction over torts committed online, giving claimants the choice of suing in their home courts. [read post]
2 Nov 2011, 7:09 am
Excuse me while I faint, but Family Law Week has just reported that the long-awaited Supreme Court judgment in Kernott v Jones is to be handed down next Wednesday, the 9th November. [read post]
1 Nov 2011, 4:59 am by INFORRM
Of the media lawyers and journalists I have talked to, the general view is that prices have been coming down. [read post]
30 Oct 2011, 6:17 am
On appeal, the Easterby court distinguished its circumstances from that of Kennemur and Jones, stating: The present case differs from Kennemur, Jones and [Bonds v. [read post]
30 Oct 2011, 6:17 am by Moseley Collins
On appeal, the Easterby court distinguished its circumstances from that of Kennemur and Jones, stating: The present case differs from Kennemur, Jones and [Bonds v. [read post]