Search for: "Employee Welfare Benefit Plan" Results 1421 - 1440 of 1,616
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
10 Apr 2011, 5:30 pm
Although the pain of the present is not pleasant for Taft-Hartley plans nor for the employees whose retirement, health, and other welfare plan interests they represent, the hope is that through this necessary recalibration and restructuring multiemployer benefit plans will become stronger, with more secure participants and beneficiaries in the near future. [read post]
10 Apr 2011, 5:30 pm
Although the pain of the present is not pleasant for Taft-Hartley plans nor for the employees whose retirement, health, and other welfare plan interests they represent, the hope is that through this necessary recalibration and restructuring multiemployer benefit plans will become stronger, with more secure participants and beneficiaries in the near future. [read post]
10 Apr 2011, 5:30 pm
Although the pain of the present is not pleasant for Taft-Hartley plans nor for the employees whose retirement, health, and other welfare plan interests they represent, the hope is that through this necessary recalibration and restructuring multiemployer benefit plans will become stronger, with more secure participants and beneficiaries in the near future. [read post]
10 Apr 2011, 5:30 pm
Although the pain of the present is not pleasant for Taft-Hartley plans nor for the employees whose retirement, health, and other welfare plan interests they represent, the hope is that through this necessary recalibration and restructuring multiemployer benefit plans will become stronger, with more secure participants and beneficiaries in the near future. [read post]
10 Apr 2011, 5:30 pm
Although the pain of the present is not pleasant for Taft-Hartley plans nor for the employees whose retirement, health, and other welfare plan interests they represent, the hope is that through this necessary recalibration and restructuring multiemployer benefit plans will become stronger, with more secure participants and beneficiaries in the near future. [read post]
2 Apr 2011, 12:23 pm by Rich
It mainly concerns those welfare benefit plans (ERISA is actually not a bad law with respect to pension plans). [read post]
28 Mar 2011, 11:13 am by Mike
Second, the CBA required that Defendant make payments into the employee benefit plan for work done outside of Northern California if that work was done by employees from Northern California. [read post]
27 Mar 2011, 2:06 pm by Gary Becker
The higher compensation of public employees is heavily weighted toward deferred benefits in the form of favorable medical plans, and especially early retirement ages with generous retirement incomes. [read post]
15 Mar 2011, 8:00 am by Sonya Hubbard
” On his way out the door, Foster Wheeler paid Flexon for 24 months of salary continuation, an amount equal to twice his short-term incentive bonus, enough money so that he could pay the employee’s share of any health and welfare benefits for 24 months, two years of additional age and service credit under any pension plans, and enough to pay for Flexon and his family to move back to the United States (the proxy doesn’t say whether it cost as much… [read post]
12 Mar 2011, 8:43 pm
In the above situation, unless the employer is a state or local government or a church, the employer most likely created a welfare benefit plan covered by Employee Retirement Income Security Act ("ERISA") § 3(1), and the funds withheld from your wages to go towards the insurance premiums become plan assets "as of the earliest date on which such contributions . . . can reasonably be segregated from the employer's general assets. [read post]
24 Feb 2011, 10:36 am by LindaMBeale
  The Koch brothers' family fortune is based primarily in oil, and they have benefited hugely from the various subsidies provided for Big Oil by the federal government. [read post]
16 Feb 2011, 6:09 pm by Roy F Harmon III
Below appears a recent DOL Advisory Opinion on MEWA status of a health plan benefit plan: 2011-01A ERISA SEC. 3(40) & 514(b)(6) Dear Mr. [read post]
16 Feb 2011, 5:18 am by Stanley D. Baum
To be an ERISA-covered employee welfare benefit plan, a plan must be established and maintained by an employer for the benefit of its employees, and it is likely that the Green Cross Program and the Depawix Plan did not meet this requirement. [read post]
10 Feb 2011, 4:05 pm by Rebecca Shafer, J.D.
Weekly progress meetings allow the company to demonstrate its concern about the continued welfare of the employee. ? [read post]
10 Feb 2011, 10:12 am
Also important is that ERISA preempts "any and all State laws insofar as they relate to any employee benefit plans". [read post]
8 Feb 2011, 5:50 pm by Rich
It mainly concerns those welfare benefit plans (ERISA is actually not a bad law with respect to pension plans). [read post]
4 Feb 2011, 7:14 pm by AALRR
  There were multiple factors that weighed against calling plaintiffs independent contractors: (1) Defendant executed the collective bargaining agreement with plaintiffs’ union, which represented the owner-operators of trucks in the role of “employees’ of the company; (2) Defendant issued W-2 forms to plaintiffs, withheld taxes, and offered health plan benefits that included paying 70 percent of the cost; (3) Defendant paid hourly rates for… [read post]
27 Jan 2011, 12:59 pm by Cynthia Marcotte Stamer
Filed under: 105(h), Discrimination, Employee Benefits, Employers, ERISA, Health Plans, Human Resources Tagged: 105(h), Affordable Care Act, Health Care Reform, Health Plans, RPTE, Stamer [read post]