Search for: "English v. English" Results 1421 - 1440 of 11,207
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
31 Mar 2015, 1:53 am by INFORRM
In Vidal-Hall v, Google Inc ([2015] EWCA Civ 311) the Court of Appeal dismissed Google’s appeal from the decision of Tugendhat J in which he declined to declare that the English court did not have jurisdiction to hear data protection and misuse of private information claims brought against it. [read post]
10 Dec 2015, 7:29 am by Amy Howe
Yesterday’s oral arguments in Fisher v. [read post]
14 Feb 2020, 10:56 am by Christopher G. Hill
Related Musings:My Client Was Cited by Virginia Occupational Safety…English v. [read post]
8 Jun 2016, 4:00 am by Administrator
Each Wednesday we tell you which three English-language cases and which French-language case have been the most viewed* on CanLII and we give you a small sense of what the cases are about. [read post]
8 Jan 2020, 6:42 am by Christopher G. Hill
More Hensel Phelps Ripples in the Statute of…English v. [read post]
7 Feb 2024, 5:15 pm by Administrator
For this past month, the three most-consulted English-language decisions were: R. v. [read post]
4 Oct 2023, 6:00 am by Administrator
  For this past month, the three most-consulted English-language decisions were: Singh et. al. v Braich, 2023 ONSC 5053 [1] This motion is about an examination for discovery gone wrong. [read post]
20 Oct 2010, 2:07 am
This is entirely in conformity with the principles set out by the House of Lords in American Cyanamid v. [read post]
21 Feb 2019, 3:50 am
 In two recent decisions (“Unwired Planet” and “Conversant”) (Unwired Planet v Huawei [2018] EWCA Civ 2344, IPKat post here; Huawei v Conversant [2019] EWCA Civ 38, IPKat post here), the English Court of Appeal has endorsed this practice.Fair, Reasonable and Non-Discriminatory? [read post]
27 Nov 2011, 3:59 am by INFORRM
   Although a defamatory publication is actionable without proof of either intention or special damage in English law it must be shown that a “substantial tort” has been committed (see  and Lait v Evening Standard [2011] EWCA Civ 859). [read post]
27 May 2016, 7:00 am by Liam MacLean, Shepherd and Wedderburn
The claims were brought against the Ministry of Defence in the English courts. [read post]
27 Nov 2015, 3:25 am by Nick Armstrong, Matrix
From 2005 English language proficiency was required for citizenship. [read post]