Search for: "Facebook Inc"
Results 1421 - 1440
of 4,987
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
1 Oct 2019, 8:15 am
Over three dozen separate briefs were filed in support of Bostock and Zarda, including one brief by 206 companies – including business giants such as Apple, Facebook, Uber, Walt Disney and Coca-Cola. [read post]
1 Oct 2019, 7:02 am
Nat’l Resource Defense Council, Inc., 467 U.S. 837 (1984), courts give great deference to agency interpretations of statute, subject to certain conditions. [read post]
30 Sep 2019, 6:08 am
Justice Department will open an antitrust investigation of Facebook Inc., a person familiar with the matter said on Wednesday, marking the fourth recent antitrust probe of the social media company. [read post]
27 Sep 2019, 1:21 pm
Facebook, Inc., No. 19-5849 (N.D. [read post]
27 Sep 2019, 1:21 pm
Facebook, Inc., No. 19-5849 (N.D. [read post]
27 Sep 2019, 11:38 am
Spanx, Inc., No. 2:17-cv-09147-SVW-AS, 2019 WL 4390564 (C.D. [read post]
27 Sep 2019, 5:29 am
These provocative policy questions at the heart of hiQ Labs, Inc. v. [read post]
27 Sep 2019, 2:49 am
Golden, Professor in Law at the University of Texas School of Law As noted in a Patently-O post of September 18, in Facebook, Inc. v. [read post]
25 Sep 2019, 3:58 pm
Beginning January 1, 2020, only employees earning at least $684 per week (equivalent to $35,568 per year for a full year worker) can qualify for payment on a salaried basis as employees exempt from the Fair Labor Standards Act (“FLSA”) minimum wage and overtime requirements under the “White Collar Exemption” for executive, administrative, professional, outside sales, computer employees and at least $107, 342 per year to qualify as exempt from the minimum wage and overtime… [read post]
25 Sep 2019, 6:30 am
Author Rebecca Shafer, JD, President of Amaxx Risk Solutions, Inc. is a national expert in the field of workers compensation. [read post]
24 Sep 2019, 12:01 pm
Since Proppant, the Federal Circuit has had an opportunity to consider PTAB issue joinder practices in Facebook, Inc. v. [read post]
20 Sep 2019, 4:25 am
Additionally, plaintiff’s section 487 cause of action lacks the requisite particularity (see CPLR 3016 [b]; Facebook, Inc. v DLA Piper LLP [US], 134 AD3d 610, 615 [1st Dept 2015], lv denied 28 NY3d 903 [2016]). [read post]
18 Sep 2019, 2:53 pm
Facebook, Inc. v. [read post]
16 Sep 2019, 6:20 am
House Judiciary Committee on Friday requested information from Apple Inc. [read post]
16 Sep 2019, 4:30 am
& Care Home, Inc. v. [read post]
15 Sep 2019, 11:40 am
(Lyla Qureshi, Equilar, Inc.). [read post]
10 Sep 2019, 10:45 am
In a long-awaited decision in hiQ Labs, Inc. v. [read post]
10 Sep 2019, 4:59 am
Martin Marietta Materials, Inc., 2019 WL 4242670 (D. [read post]
9 Sep 2019, 4:22 pm
Power Ventures was a service that accessed users' Facebook profiles with the users' permission and moved the data to a different website run by Power Ventures. [read post]
9 Sep 2019, 1:20 pm
Citing to its own pronouncements in the first Nosal case and Facebook v. [read post]
