Search for: "French v. French"
Results 1421 - 1440
of 5,346
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
28 Mar 2019, 11:34 pm
It was originally supposed to be about various motions, and Judge Curiel made it clear that all those Rule 44.1 motions relating to questions under French law (governing the ETSI FRAND declaration) were basically summary judgment motions in disguise and he'd need more time to rule on them. [read post]
27 Mar 2019, 4:46 pm
The NCC’ s first case Elavon Financial Services DAC v. [read post]
27 Mar 2019, 5:01 am
David French explains why. [read post]
22 Mar 2019, 1:29 pm
The Supreme Court affirmed as much in its 2015 decision in Zivotofsky v. [read post]
21 Mar 2019, 4:00 am
v=pxTqQSb4RmI. [read post]
19 Mar 2019, 6:43 am
In 2009, the civil case of Wiwa v. [read post]
19 Mar 2019, 6:43 am
In 2009, the civil case of Wiwa v. [read post]
19 Mar 2019, 5:30 am
In re: Sssotlohiefmjn v. [read post]
18 Mar 2019, 9:04 am
Sadler * No: Justices DeWine, French, and O’Donnell. [read post]
17 Mar 2019, 5:35 pm
French Polynesia Radio NZ reports that a senior French Polynesian politician is appealing against his conviction for defaming the president, Edouard Fritch. [read post]
15 Mar 2019, 12:46 pm
Apple won the exclusion of deposition testimony of French law professor Bénédicte Fauvarque-Cosson regarding the interpretation of the ETSI FRAND declaration under French law (also served as an expert witness for Qualcomm in the FTC case, but wasn't made use of in the end) and former Bosch IP executive Dr. [read post]
15 Mar 2019, 6:54 am
Antoon v. [read post]
14 Mar 2019, 5:29 pm
Last month, it was the terms and conditions of Google that were subjected to judicial scrutiny, in a decision handed by the same Tribunal on 12 February 2019 (decision: Paris Tribunal (Tribunal de Grande Instance), UFC-Que Choisir v Google Inc (12 February 2019), see here for the decision in French). [read post]
13 Mar 2019, 4:00 am
Bowman v. [read post]
10 Mar 2019, 8:55 am
CopyrightThe 1709 Blog reports on the US Supreme Court decision in Fourth Estate Public Benefit Corp. v. [read post]
8 Mar 2019, 10:02 am
However, according to scholarly literature, "the exclusion of translations from the definition should be confined to true and accurate translations, as it is difficult to see why an author should not be able to object to a translation which murders his work or distorts its meaning" (1987 French case of Zorine (Leonide) v Le Lucernaire L. [read post]
7 Mar 2019, 6:00 am
It will always be an issue of what is best for employees v. what is in the best interest of the employers business. [read post]
