Search for: "Haire v. State"
Results 1421 - 1440
of 1,766
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
14 Jun 2010, 7:11 pm
Building upon our prior opinion in Jaubert v. [read post]
3 Jun 2010, 1:30 pm
As a result, the report states, prosecutors have simply excluded blacks for other stated reasons such as lack of education, wearing glasses or dyed hair. [read post]
2 Jun 2010, 7:28 am
• The rule banning racially discriminatory use of peremptory strikes announced in Batson v. [read post]
27 May 2010, 6:53 am
Justice Quince is asking the right questions In effect, Justice Quince is asking the same question at the heart of Kelo v. [read post]
26 May 2010, 4:09 am
See the full opinion in Scroggs/Gariepy v. [read post]
25 May 2010, 10:11 am
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Today the United States Supreme Court granted certiorari review in Skinner v. [read post]
25 May 2010, 8:11 am
“We look forward to the opportunity to persuade the court that if a state official arbitrarily denies a prisoner access to evidence for DNA testing, the prisoner should be allowed to challenge that decision in a federal civil rights lawsuit,” Owen said. [read post]
24 May 2010, 8:21 am
District Judge Mary Cooper said in dismissing the suit, Edelman v. [read post]
20 May 2010, 4:12 pm
Hassan, who was also detained, to request a cover for her hair and body from police officers. [read post]
19 May 2010, 4:49 am
I say State and Territory, because all the legislation is State (or Territory) based and there is no uniform Commonwealth legislation.In Queensland, protection orders can be obtained under the Domestic and Family Violence Protection Act 1989 which, since 2003, has extended to same sex couples. [read post]
18 May 2010, 1:10 am
(IPblog) US General – Decisions District Court E D Wisconsin: Can a trade secret licensee state a claim? [read post]
16 May 2010, 6:25 am
LEXIS 46323 (ED CA, April 9, 2010), a California federal district court held plaintiff's charge that prison officials harassed him about his dreadlocks did not state a free exercise claim.In Tapp v. [read post]
12 May 2010, 11:01 am
What can I say, gotta love state court! [read post]
11 May 2010, 6:08 am
That is a tough hair to split. [read post]
6 May 2010, 12:39 pm
Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit today denied the government’s motion to dismiss the defendant’s appeal in the case of United States v. [read post]
5 May 2010, 5:24 am
Livingston v. [read post]
3 May 2010, 12:25 pm
I assume that no one thinks that the witness's hair or neck are important physical features insofar as credibility is concerned. [read post]
30 Apr 2010, 3:24 am
The Supreme Court finished oral argument for the term this week, but the big news was the Court’s acceptance of certiorari in Schwarzenegger v. [read post]
29 Apr 2010, 3:50 pm
State v. [read post]
