Search for: "High v State"
Results 1421 - 1440
of 35,506
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
23 Jan 2012, 8:26 am
State v. [read post]
26 May 2009, 7:40 am
The California Supreme Court today in Strauss v. [read post]
11 May 2018, 4:00 am
In NML Capital v. [read post]
24 May 2022, 11:59 am
The case is T.B. v. [read post]
28 Jun 2024, 11:46 am
United States and Ohio v. [read post]
7 Oct 2011, 2:18 am
Court of Appeal (Civil Division) Kapoor v National Westminster Bank Plc & Anor [2011] EWCA Civ 1083 (05 October 2011) High Court (Queen’s Bench Division) Trustees of Beardsley Theobalds Retirement Benefit Scheme v Yardley [2011] EWHC 1380 (QB) (30 September 2011) Triplot & Anor v Whetter [2011] EWHC 931 (QB) (30 September 2011) Cartlidge Morland (a firm) v Thomas [2011] EWHC 2086 (QB) (30 September 2011) Butler- Creagh v AIDA… [read post]
20 Jun 2011, 6:12 pm
The main issue decided by the United States Supreme Court in Turner v. [read post]
6 May 2011, 1:00 pm
ARTICLE VII If a fugitive criminal claimed by one of the High Contracting Parties shall be also claimed by one or more powers pursuant to Treaty provisions, on account of crime committed within their jurisdiction, such criminal shall be delivered to that state whose demand is first received unless that state shall have abandoned its claim. [read post]
25 Jul 2017, 8:28 am
Ziglar v. [read post]
11 Feb 2015, 12:04 pm
Citing Clapper v. [read post]
6 May 2011, 3:55 am
This is consistent with the high court’s rulings in other recent cases limiting Congress’ efforts to subject states to federal law under statutes adopted pursuant to the “commerce clause” such as Alden v Maine, 527 U.S. 706, a case involving suing states in federal court for alleged violations of the Fair Labor Standards Act.* The high court said that the 11th Amendment bars a state employee from suing his or her employer… [read post]
10 Nov 2010, 2:15 am
The points to consider were stated to be:“(i) the financial position of the parties (s289(2) 1988 Act). [read post]
5 Nov 2014, 9:10 am
" O'Connor v. [read post]
28 Jul 2008, 6:45 am
Sisney v. [read post]
20 Jul 2022, 4:24 am
The correct approach is to follow the guidance which was stated to be “authoritative” in KO (Nigeria), namely the direction in the Upper Tribunal case of MK (Sierra Leone) v Secretary of State for the Home Department [2015] INLR 563 (“MK”). [read post]
31 Mar 2018, 1:23 am
Professor Howard similarly stated that the skilled person could have engineered a minigene construct including rearranged V, D and J segments. [read post]
21 Jul 2013, 8:17 am
Grits has been heartened that several other states - so far Montana, Missouri and Maine, that I know of - have legislatively required a warrant for cell-phone location data, but New Jersey is the first state high court that I'm aware of to do so. [read post]
25 Feb 2022, 9:15 am
Grassley asks DHS Secretary Mayorkas to dispel concerns that the OPT STEM program is expanding beyond its original mission of aiding the U.S. high tech workforce; the United States remains top ranked in the... [read post]
2 Apr 2008, 5:35 am
State v. [read post]
6 Aug 2018, 7:15 am
Gender Inequality in 21st Century Britain: Using litigation as a tool Direct Sex Discrimination and Disadvantage to women: R (Coll) v Secretary of State for Justice [2017] UKSC 40 Introduction: Does Law Have a Gender? [read post]
