Search for: "Holder v. State" Results 1421 - 1440 of 7,273
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
19 Jun 2014, 9:15 am
§1322(b)(2) states that the plan may: "modify the rights of holders of secured claims, other than a claim secured only by a security interest in real property that is the debtor’s principal residence, or of holders of unsecured claims, or leave unaffected the rights of holders of any class of claims. [read post]
21 Oct 2010, 3:11 pm
467/08, Padawan SL v Sociedad General de Autores y Editores de España (SGAE) had just been uploaded on to the Curia website. [read post]
28 Aug 2019, 5:39 pm by Ken Moon
 The appeal decision in Capitol Records v ReDigi issued December 2018 did not attract anywhere near the same attention as the 2015 trial decision. [read post]
15 Jan 2007, 10:13 am
The United States, for example, has the U.S. [read post]
14 Oct 2011, 11:07 am by Randy Barnett
S. 606 et seq.; United States v. [read post]
30 Aug 2010, 5:30 am
 The Seventh Circuit stated that every holder of Lincoln’s variable life policies enjoyed such a right. [read post]
5 May 2009, 2:04 am
I exclusion states the insurer is not liable for a claim that “is brought by an Insured or by the Company; which is brought by any security holder of the Company, whether directly or derivatively, unless such security holder’s Claim is instigated and continued totally independent of, and totally without the solicitation of, or assistance of, or active participation of, or intervention of, any Insured. [read post]
28 Jun 2013, 2:47 pm by Cicely Wilson
Holder, Jr., United States Supreme Court (6/25/13)Click here to review the Justia summary and read commentary on this decision.Affirmative ActionFisher v. [read post]