Search for: "Identive Group Inc." Results 1421 - 1440 of 2,353
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
10 Mar 2014, 11:29 am by Kim Phan
Northland Group Inc., a case on appeal before the Sixth Circuit. [read post]
5 Mar 2014, 2:46 pm
Liggett Group, Inc., 505 U.S. 504, 530 (1992), where the Supreme Court first rejected notion that torts were somehow different from other forms of government regulation. [read post]
25 Feb 2014, 9:33 am by DMLP Staff
Delaney (Bean, Kinney & Korman, P.C.)Verdict or Settlement Amount: $1,500.00Source of Law: United StatesVirginiaCourt Name: Circuit Court for the City of AlexandriaLegal Counsel: Paul Alan Levy and Scott Michelman (Public Citizen Litigation Group), and Raymond D. [read post]
25 Feb 2014, 9:33 am by DMLP Staff
Delaney (Bean, Kinney & Korman, P.C.)Verdict or Settlement Amount: $1,500.00Source of Law: United StatesVirginiaCourt Name: Circuit Court for the City of AlexandriaLegal Counsel: Paul Alan Levy and Scott Michelman (Public Citizen Litigation Group), and Raymond D. [read post]
25 Feb 2014, 9:33 am by DMLP Staff
Delaney (Bean, Kinney & Korman, P.C.)Source of Law: United StatesVirginiaLegal Claims: ConspiracyDefamationCourt Name: Circuit Court for the City of AlexandriaLegal Counsel: Paul Alan Levy and Scott Michelman (Public Citizen Litigation Group), and Raymond D. [read post]
23 Feb 2014, 6:01 pm by Joy Waltemath
” It could conceive of no circumstances when calling a subordinate that name would be acceptable (Johnson v STRIVE East Harlem Employment Group). [read post]
21 Feb 2014, 10:48 am by Ron Coleman
” She added, “Unlike a community group, the athlete needs no gratuitous promotion and his identity has commercial value. [read post]
20 Feb 2014, 5:24 am by Rebecca Tushnet
Unlike a community group, the athlete needs no gratuitous promotion and his identity has commercial value. [read post]
13 Feb 2014, 6:18 am by Terry Hart
What Optus actually does has – a nexus sufficiently close and causal to the illegal copying that one could conclude that the machine owner … trespassed on the exclusive domain of the copyright owners: CoStar Group Inc v LoopNet Inc, 373 F3d 544 at 550 (4th Circ. 2004). [read post]
9 Feb 2014, 2:27 pm
 More recently, in Fenty v Arcadia Group Brands Ltd (t/a Topshop)  [2013] EWHC 2310 (noted by the IPKat here), pop star Rihanna succeeded in her claim for passing off against retail giant Topshop, who used her image on a t-shirt without her permission. [read post]
9 Feb 2014, 6:18 am by David Jensen
Stanford and Stanford faculty-founded companies such as Stem Cells Inc, are blatantly promoted over others. [read post]
6 Feb 2014, 10:16 am
See, e.g., Playboy Entm’t Group, Inc., 529 U.S. at 813 (citing Cohen in discussing how “content-based speech restriction[s]” aimed at offensive speech are treated). [read post]
28 Jan 2014, 3:36 pm by Marty Lederman
  A holding that the three corporations at issue here--Hobby Lobby Stores, Inc., Mardel, Inc., and Conestoga Wood Specialties Corp. [read post]