Search for: "In Re Campbell"
Results 1421 - 1440
of 1,444
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
15 Feb 2007, 12:25 am
Campbell, 500 P.2d 21, 33-34 (Kan. 1972); City & County of San Francisco v. [read post]
5 Feb 2007, 7:43 am
February 5, 2007Re: The Preternaturally Prolific Posner on Plagiarism.From: Dean Lawrence R. [read post]
29 Jan 2007, 3:23 am
As this NY Times article reports, the life of even a relatively high-income NFL football player is no picnic: [F]ootball players' careers resemble life as Thomas Hobbes described it in the 17th century: they're nasty, brutish and short. [read post]
23 Jan 2007, 5:30 am
No, they’re just basic blocking-and-tackling issues that had been warped into a work of financial fiction. [read post]
18 Jan 2007, 10:48 am
This time, we're posting about experts. [read post]
13 Jan 2007, 11:15 am
., [1971] 5 W.W.R. 97 (B.C.C.A.) at pp. 100 and 105; Donald Campbell & Co. v. [read post]
5 Jan 2007, 2:36 am
They tend to sit low to the ground, offer multiple options for shots, include short, driveable par-fours, room to drive the ball, angles, and above all, they're fun to play. [read post]
4 Jan 2007, 10:05 am
Richard Campbell and Wayne Sturtevant and Circuit Court Judge Judith Proffitt. [read post]
28 Dec 2006, 6:06 pm
Assuming you're not tired of the Steve Jobs watch (and why would you be, given that the only other news this week has been obituaries?) [read post]
19 Dec 2006, 6:22 am
The Court considered whether the claims were barred by res judicata which bars relitigation of issues raised and considered in a prior criminal proceeding. [read post]
21 Nov 2006, 10:26 pm
They'd better tell their clients what they're up to, because only 11% of the clients agreed with the exact same statement. [read post]
19 Nov 2006, 1:11 pm
John Campbell, a Republican who represents Huntington Beach, points out that neither Santa Cruz nor Huntington Beach qualifies to be Surf City, under the terms of the classic Jan and Dean song, as neither place has "two girls for every boy.'' "I've done some research,'' Campbell said. [read post]
13 Nov 2006, 7:25 am
" (Remember her infamous love scene with Neve Campbell?) [read post]
11 Nov 2006, 1:16 pm
Let's face it, they're lawyers, which should automatically disqualify them as all that knowledgeable about art. [read post]
6 Nov 2006, 9:38 am
If you're interested in reading more about what it's like to work in-house, these blogs would be excellent additions to your blogroll: Standards Law (David Rubin, Microsoft attorney) the legal thing...notes from a General Counsel (Mike Dillon, Sun Microsystems GC) Cisco High Tech Policy Blog (Two of the blog's contributors, Adam Golodner & Jeffrey Campbell, are Cisco in-house lawyers.) [read post]
31 Oct 2006, 11:10 am
Because they're judicially created and developed creatures of the common law. [read post]
23 Oct 2006, 1:18 pm
The only other major case on my agenda is the Campbell case in the Sixth Circuit, brief due on November 14, 2006. [read post]
22 Oct 2006, 9:10 pm
"We're here, we're queer, and we aren't going shopping without coupons" proclaims the tagline of the Queercents personal finance blog, where Nina posts an interesting little story about God and the Million Dollar Bill.Is it worth taking a $10k pay cut for a job you love? [read post]
11 Oct 2006, 10:20 am
It's not clear what will come of the NFC, but from a fair use perspective, I think they're well in the clear. [read post]
12 Sep 2006, 10:07 am
Campbell, State v. [read post]
