Search for: "In the Matter of: Graham"
Results 1421 - 1440
of 2,072
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
2 Dec 2021, 10:00 am
Johannsongs-Publishing claimed that You Raise Me Up, which was written by Rolf Lovland and Brendan Graham and released in 2001 by Secret Garden and later by Josh Groban in 2003 infringed on its rights in Soknodur. [read post]
9 Feb 2015, 10:45 am
” In other words, it doesn’t matter that the Palestinians have already done all they can do to bring about such an investigation; what matters is their success. [read post]
15 Apr 2018, 9:01 pm
Indeed, some—like Senator Lindsey Graham (R-SC)—have predicted this step would be the beginning of the end of his presidency, which is obviously a political calculation, not a legal judgment. [read post]
22 Feb 2022, 10:49 am
Simmons, 543 U.S. 551 (2005) (prohibiting the juvenile death penalty); Graham v. [read post]
4 Apr 2017, 11:39 am
If enough people believe that the intelligence community is a political instrument of those in power to be used against opponents, it actually doesn’t matter if it’s untrue. [read post]
13 Feb 2019, 1:34 pm
Lindsey Graham: When his report comes to you, will you share it with us as much as possible? [read post]
19 Jul 2018, 7:30 am
As a matter of policy, the ACLU, of which David Cole is the National Legal Director, neither endorses nor opposes Supreme Court nominees. [read post]
12 Apr 2018, 3:34 pm
Lindsey Graham has said it would be “the beginning of the end of [Trump’s] presidency. [read post]
12 Apr 2018, 3:34 pm
Lindsey Graham has said it would be “the beginning of the end of [Trump’s] presidency. [read post]
9 May 2017, 5:58 pm
Lindsey Graham (R-SC): I know this was a difficult decision for all concerned. [read post]
16 Apr 2012, 10:57 pm
See Graham-Rutledge & Co. v. [read post]
11 Mar 2015, 9:10 pm
See Graham v. [read post]
9 Jun 2014, 7:49 am
Maxtone-Graham: abortion-related book. [read post]
2 Dec 2019, 12:35 pm
But the chief justice does not have to play this role, and he is not the final word on matters when he does. [read post]
13 Apr 2022, 6:23 am
Graham told the New York Times earlier this week. [read post]
20 Aug 2010, 3:35 pm
Under the four part test for obviousness detailed in Graham v. [read post]
28 Mar 2022, 9:01 pm
Why should the subjective intentions of the framers (or ratifiers) matter, when they enacted only the text? [read post]
10 Aug 2012, 6:15 pm
Stein: court resolves by moving away from subject matter to originality. [read post]
3 Oct 2016, 1:19 pm
And control the client’s expectations from the start of the matter. [read post]
18 Sep 2017, 1:36 am
Graham explained that “his” Board of Appeal often sketched the argument for inventive step as well as against inventive step, assuming first that the invention is based on inventive step, then assuming that it is not based on inventive step. [read post]
