Search for: "J&E, LLC"
Results 1421 - 1440
of 1,594
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
26 Dec 2013, 1:27 pm
(f/k/a Plimus).David J. [read post]
28 Jan 2024, 8:49 pm
The Colorado Supreme Court majority held that Secretary of State Griswold would commit a “wrongful act” within the meaning of section 1-1-113 of the Colorado Election Code if she placed Trump’s name on the Republican presidential primary ballot because section 1-4-1203(2)(a) of the Code allows only “qualified” candidates to participate in such a primary election and Trump is not “qualified” to be President by virtue of his conduct on January… [read post]
12 Sep 2008, 2:33 pm
: (Excess Copyright), Election stalls copyright reform: (ipblog.ca), Digital issues deserve a spot in the election campaign: (Michael Geist), Canadian-based torrent tracker isoHunt files suit against Canadian Recording Industry Association seeking confirmation that it does not infringe Canadian copyright law: (Michael Geist), (ipblog.ca), (Techdirt), 61 reforms to C-61: (Day 55: e-reserve provisions require DRM – Michael Geist), (Day 56: interlibrary digital loans must… [read post]
17 Jul 2020, 3:00 am
Golden Door Properties LLC v. [read post]
13 Aug 2009, 1:02 am
J. [read post]
7 Mar 2011, 12:17 pm
In a 2005, as one executive admitted in an e-mail, Medical Capital, which had issued $1.7 billion of securities, lacked audited results. [read post]
10 Mar 2020, 4:36 am
Moreover, in the UK, (in direct contradistinction from the Innsbruck decision) the decision of the Court of Appeal in Lloyd v Google LLC [2019] EWCA Civ 1599 (02 October 2019) (which I discuss briefly here) held that plaintiffs can recover damages for loss of control of their data without proving pecuniary loss or distress. [read post]
29 Jul 2011, 10:16 am
Scheindlin, Daniel J. [read post]
25 Apr 2011, 4:55 am
: A UPSTO green patent fast track update (Green Patent Blog) Concentration of patent cases in the Eastern District of Texas (Patently-O) Surviving patent reexamination (Patents Post-Grant) The more the merrier: The Journal joins the Times in complaining about patents (Patent Docs) US Patents – Decisions CAFC decision in In re Tanaka: Patentee may add narrower claims in reissue, at least for now: (Reexamination Alert) (Orange Book Blog) (Patently-O) (America-Israel Patent Law) (Patents… [read post]
12 Oct 2009, 1:42 pm
First Interstate Bank of Denver [4] and again in Stoneridge Investment Partners, LLC v. [read post]
27 Aug 2018, 12:27 pm
Mead Corp., 533 U.S. 218 (2001) (Scalia, J. dissenting). [read post]
5 Aug 2011, 6:44 am
“No one needs these homes, no one is going to buy them,” said Christopher Thornberg, founding partner at the Los Angeles office of Beacon Economics LLC, a forecasting firm. [read post]
21 Sep 2011, 6:36 am
The Court’s decision in AT&T Mobility LLC v. [read post]
17 Sep 2014, 11:20 am
In High Point Design LLC v. [read post]
19 Jul 2021, 3:20 pm
Pataki (1999): [J]ust as the First Amendment protects a legislator's right to communicate with administrative officials to provide assistance in securing a publicly funded contract, so too does it protect the legislator's right to state publicly his criticism of the granting of such a contract to a given entity and to urge to the administrators that such an award would contravene public policy. [read post]
9 Jul 2024, 6:00 am
Mortgage Bankers Assn., 575 U.S. 92, 109 (2015) (Scalia, J., concurring in judgment). [read post]
13 Aug 2024, 3:57 pm
[If participants in unauthorized encampments exclude Jewish or pro-Israel students from walking in parts of campus, UCLA would then have to close those parts to everyone.] [read post]
29 Jan 2011, 4:19 pm
Ford's attorney e-mailed Dumont's attorney, asking that Dumont reaffirm the debt. [read post]
27 Mar 2008, 5:55 pm
Maintained by two editors – Wendy Johnson Lario and Kristine J. [read post]
19 Apr 2019, 5:59 am
April 16, 2019Appellate Division, Second Department Appellate Division holds that Indian Child Welfare Act applies to Neglect Proceeding and Shinnecock Tribe had right to intervene In Matter of Durpee M, v Samantha Q., 2019 WL 1461831 (2d Dept., 2019) the mother and her husband (father) were the parents of the child, who was born in January 2017. [read post]
