Search for: "JOHN DOE II" Results 1421 - 1440 of 3,393
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
8 Mar 2017, 9:26 am
| Book review: "Brandfather: John Murphy, The Man Who Invented Branding" | IP Summit 2016 (Second Part) | Around the IP Blogs! [read post]
7 Mar 2017, 3:16 am by Dennis Crouch
It has been held that taking discovery does not trigger a waiver, nor does proceeding to trial. [read post]
4 Mar 2017, 12:55 pm by Stephen Griffin
  So does the evidence summarized by Elizabeth Weeks Leonard in her illuminating “Red State Option” article. [read post]
3 Mar 2017, 9:30 am by Benjamin Wittes, Quinta Jurecic
Because at least for me, Trump does not enter office with a presumption of regularity in his work. [read post]
27 Feb 2017, 1:22 pm
| Book review: "Brandfather: John Murphy, The Man Who Invented Branding" | IP Summit 2016 (Second Part) | Around the IP Blogs! [read post]
To put this in perspective, experts estimate a defense contractor with 600 employees should anticipate that a third-party compliance audit of its information systems and data will take three to six months, and this does not include the time needed to correct any deficiencies identified during the audit. [read post]
27 Feb 2017, 10:00 am by Steve Vladeck
” After all, even if Article II does not require such an appointment, the MCA itself does. [read post]
26 Feb 2017, 9:01 pm by Ronald D. Rotunda
What does the Ninth Circuit say about it? [read post]
26 Feb 2017, 3:31 am
I Social media, "WikiLeaks" and false news in the 18th century: Thomas Jefferson and the "Mazzei letter" I Does the economic impact of SPCs necessitate SPC Regulation reform? [read post]
23 Feb 2017, 1:36 pm by Richard Primus
  In a more recent post, John McGinnis—one of the prominent originalists at the conference I attended—has also come forth to say that I overestimated the incidence of the never-been-tried idea. [read post]
23 Feb 2017, 3:00 am by John Jenkins
” Because this does not require an employee to waive the right to any future monetary recovery from the government in connection with any communication the employee may have with the SEC, there is no violation of Rule 21F-17. [read post]
23 Feb 2017, 3:00 am by John Jenkins
” Because this does not require an employee to waive the right to any future monetary recovery from the government in connection with any communication the employee may have with the SEC, there is no violation of Rule 21F-17. [read post]
20 Feb 2017, 3:14 am by NCC Staff
” To read their full essay: http://constitutioncenter.org/interactive-constitution/articles/article-ii/commander-in-chief-clause-ramsey-and-vladeck/clause/25 Treaty and Appointments Power John O. [read post]
17 Feb 2017, 2:25 pm
  The court begins the opinion by explaining thatAppellant John Doe appeals from his convictions of aggravated identity theft under 18 U.S. [read post]