Search for: "King v. King"
Results 1421 - 1440
of 8,108
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
30 Jun 2023, 5:00 am
# # #DECISIONU. v M. [read post]
19 May 2024, 11:00 pm
CHECKS REFLECTED THAT THE DISPUTED INVOICE HAD BEEN FULLY PAIDIn a commercial claims case brought in the Kings County Civil Court, CEH&AC alleged that it was owed money for heating system services provided to MRE&P.While the plaintiff alleged that some $2,203.94 was due, after a hearing (and a review of the defendant’s payment receipts), the judge ended up dismissing the case.On appeal, the Appellate Term, Second Department, noted that the defendant’s check memos… [read post]
22 Mar 2023, 11:00 pm
”And we ain’t lying about that, neither.# # #DECISIONInk 967-969 Willoughby, LLC v Cordero [read post]
13 Jul 2022, 4:00 am
In Tucker v. [read post]
17 Sep 2014, 4:10 am
In Roman Catholic Diocese of Brooklyn, New York v. [read post]
2 Aug 2019, 12:06 pm
Page v. [read post]
18 Nov 2014, 9:00 am
A June 2015 decision is expected in the case of King v. [read post]
17 Jun 2023, 11:00 pm
# # #Matter of Kingston V. [read post]
1 Jun 2022, 7:29 am
’The case is 1:22-cv-04421, Koch et al v. [read post]
30 Oct 2020, 12:46 pm
That's the question the Supreme Court will set out to answer Monday in the case Fish and Wildlife Service v. [read post]
8 May 2023, 11:00 pm
# # #DECISION336 14th St., LLC v GM [read post]
28 Sep 2022, 11:54 am
While searching for cases in Saskatchewan, I came across this CanLII entry: Duzan v. [read post]
11 Dec 2023, 10:00 pm
”Bet there was no toasting to that.# # #DECISIONMatter of D. v. [read post]
13 Sep 2023, 5:00 am
”That clearly was no garden variety case ….# # #G. v. [read post]
1 Sep 2023, 5:00 am
In the case of Campbell v. [read post]
10 Jul 2024, 5:00 am
WAS REQUIRED TO PAY ALL FINES WITHIN TWELVE MONTHS OF CLOSINGAfter the Kings County Supreme Court denied plaintiff 410’s request – via a motion for summary judgment -- for a pre-trial ruling that the sellers had breached their contractual obligations, an appeal followed.And on its review, the Appellate Division, Second Department, noted that the parties’ agreement unequivocally provided that the defendants would pay all fines attributable to any open Environmental Control… [read post]
22 Feb 2010, 2:57 am
Burger King Corp., 66 AD3d 986, 986 [2d Dept 2009].) [read post]
20 Feb 2019, 4:38 am
Amalfitano v Rosenberg, 12 NY3d 8, 14 (2009}. [read post]
30 Jan 2018, 4:01 am
The facts are simple in Dinerman v Fox 2018 NY Slip Op 30127(U) January 16, 2018 Supreme Court, Kings County Docket Number: 513181/2016 Judge: Bernard J. [read post]
8 Nov 2016, 8:19 am
Richter, who is Partner at King & Spalding. [read post]
