Search for: "Lord v. State"
Results 1421 - 1440
of 3,574
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
19 Jan 2018, 3:58 am
The inventor's views and corresponding documents may be used to try and define claim scope, obviousness, novelty, and the state of the art. [read post]
30 Nov 2023, 7:38 am
That was a threshold condition, and not question of discretion, R (Omar) -v- Secretary of State for Foreign and Commonwealth Affairs [2014] QB 112 [30]. [read post]
12 Nov 2020, 6:35 am
The Court of Appeal considered that the acts by Russia upon which Ukraine relies for the purposes of the Duress Defence were acts of high policy (per Lord Neuberger’s ‘third rule’ in Belhaj v Straw [2017] UKSC 3). [read post]
28 Feb 2013, 12:28 pm
Lord Justice Richards (with whom Lord Justice Sullivan and the Master of the Rolls agreed) delivered the judgment, which concerned Google's liability for comments posted on the very blogging platform which hosts also the IPKat, ie Blogger. [read post]
16 Oct 2020, 3:32 am
While Lord Millett in Bolkiah had explicitly stated that the assessment should not be a balancing exercise, this depended on there being a fiduciary duty owed by a solicitor to a former client to prioritise his interests. [read post]
25 Feb 2014, 4:55 am
Judge Kevin Aalto identified five factors to be looked at:- the plaintiff must have a bona fide case- another party must have information pertinent to the case (eg personal details of subscribers)- a court order is the only reasonable way of obtaining this information- that fairness requires the information to be provided before thr trial- any order will not cause undue delay, inconvenience or expense to the third party or othersThere is also a comprehensive review of Canadian case law;… [read post]
8 Apr 2019, 3:34 am
The proposed panel for hand down is Lord Reed, Lord Briggs, Lord Sales. [read post]
28 Apr 2013, 7:04 am
The approach articulated by Lord Sumption is the opposite of that stated by Proudman J at first instance: “The exception cannot have been intended to legitimise all copies made in the course of browsing or users would be permitted to watch pirated films and listen to pirated music. [read post]
22 Jun 2010, 10:26 pm
An example raised by Lord Rodger in Savage was the obligations of state officials towards those with suicidal intent from travelling to Switzerland: of course they cannnot forcibly prevented them from doing this. [read post]
13 Dec 2021, 12:18 pm
At paragraph 17 Lord Steyn sets out four propositions : First, neither article has as such precedence over the other. [read post]
17 Dec 2012, 2:30 am
This week’s resolved cases include: Dolan-Powers v The Observer, Clause 1, 14/12/2012 Weston Area Health NHS Trust v Weston, Worle & Somerset Mercury, Clause 1, 10/12/2012 Lord Hunt, chair of the PCC, has appointed Lord Chris Smith (former Labour culture secretary), Simon Jenkins (former editor of the Times) and Lord Phillips (former president of the supreme court) as unpaid special advisers to help set up a new press regulator. [read post]
14 Nov 2010, 1:39 pm
Rejecting Renvoi: Iran v Berend BAILII has just published the intriging judgment in Iran v... [read post]
16 Dec 2015, 2:57 am
In delivering the lead judgment Lord Sumption stated that the Court of Appeal’s finding that the Authority’s evaluation was irrational was unjustified. [read post]
29 Jan 2020, 2:30 am
Lord Briggs gave the main judgment. [read post]
16 Feb 2011, 3:52 am
The leading case on the issue is the House of Lords judgment in the 2004 case of R v. [read post]
15 May 2023, 2:51 pm
United States v. [read post]
16 Feb 2012, 11:43 pm
Glenn Mulcaire v News Group Newspapers The facts Mr Mulcaire was employed by NGN as a private investigator between 2002 and 2007. [read post]
2 Apr 2009, 4:54 am
However Lord justice Thorpe found four other reasons for refusing relief:1. [read post]
13 Nov 2023, 4:57 pm
The natural and ordinary meaning Citing Lord Bridge in Charleston v News Group Newspapers [1995] 2 AC 65, Master Bell emphasised that in order to determine the natural and ordinary meaning of the words of which a plaintiff complains, one must consider the context in which the words were used and the mode of publication [8]. [read post]
20 Feb 2011, 1:24 pm
Article 8 did not require contracting states to make suitable sites available to gypsies (Chapman v UK). [read post]
