Search for: "Louisiana v. United States" Results 1421 - 1440 of 2,349
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
24 Jan 2011, 11:25 am by Tana Fye
”[27]              The United States Supreme Court recognized that the proceeding at issue was a “child custody proceeding” and that the children involved in that proceeding were “Indian children. [read post]
27 May 2016, 8:00 am by John Elwood
Louisiana — the case which declared that Miller v. [read post]
4 Mar 2011, 9:11 am by Christa Culver
United StatesDocket: 10-516Issue(s): Whether an essential element to be proven for a conviction for the offense of bribery of a state or local official under 18 U.S.C. [read post]
4 Apr 2012, 8:13 am by John Elwood
United States, 11-5683, and Hill v. [read post]
27 Jun 2011, 5:47 am by Lisa Baird
As many of you no doubt have heard, the United States Supreme Court last week decided that FDA regulations applicable to generic drug manufacturers preempt state law "failure to warn" claims in PLIVA, Inc. v. [read post]
14 Feb 2020, 8:00 am by NCC Staff
Russo, and says that accepting the arguments of Louisiana and the U.S. [read post]
1 Feb 2013, 9:42 am by Bexis
Schwarz Pharma, Inc., 702 F.3d 177, 186 (5th Cir. 2012) (design defect claims are “failure-to-warn claims under different names” and preempted) (applying Louisiana law); Frazier v. [read post]
6 Nov 2007, 7:36 am
This guide has been compiled by United Cerebral Palsy as a portion of their One-Stop Resource Guide. [read post]
26 May 2009, 11:51 am
The Court concludes that the Jackson rule does not "pay its way," United States v. [read post]
28 Sep 2015, 12:19 pm by Rebecca Tushnet
 China then began rejecting all corn from the United States containing the MIR 162 trait, which persisted for over a year. [read post]
27 Sep 2018, 1:23 pm by Steven Cohen
United States District Court – Eastern District of Louisiana – September 18th, 2018) involves a trip and fall claim. [read post]
2 Mar 2023, 7:20 am by John Elwood
United States, 21-8190Issue: Whether this Court should overturn its decision in United States v. [read post]