Search for: "MATTER OF B P B P" Results 1421 - 1440 of 5,342
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
23 Aug 2012, 12:21 pm by lawmrh
” And besides, why does it even matter that Augusta has supposedly crossed the Rubicon of race and gender? [read post]
24 Oct 2010, 9:05 pm by cdw
The ex parte collaboration between Judge Stuard and the prosecution to prepare the court’s sentencing opinion was “wholly inconsistent” with the ethical constraints of Canon 3(B)(7) and DR 7-110(B). [read post]
1 Oct 2013, 5:53 pm
(Pix (c) Larry Catá Backer 2013) I have been posting about the development of a new course I have been developing for our first year law school students, "Elements of Law." [read post]
13 Apr 2013, 10:14 am by Kelly Phillips Erb
No matter the reason, bonuses are considered taxable income to the recipient and should be included on your federal form W-2. [read post]
24 May 2010, 9:10 pm by cdw
§ 924(c)(1)(B)(ii) that must be proved to a jury beyond a reasonable doubt as it is an element of the offense and not merely  a sentencing factor. [read post]
14 Aug 2014, 11:00 pm by Giesela Ruehl
Holding The highest German court in civil matters reversed the previous judgments and ordered the Local Court to include the updated list in the records of the company. [read post]
15 Nov 2011, 2:16 pm by Valerie Katz
After writing months’ worth of columns for Size Matters, I now consider myself somewhat of a career coach for small-firm attorneys. [read post]
6 Jan 2021, 7:52 am by Courtenay C. Brinckerhoff
Terminal Disclaimer Practice Obviousness-type double patenting may arise when a later-expiring patent/application claims subject matter that is deemed to be an obvious variation of subject matter claimed in an earlier-expiring patent/application with the same or overlapping inventorship or ownership. [read post]
20 Sep 2010, 10:38 am by Pace Law Library
Why context matters: defining service animals under federal law. 37 Pepp. [read post]
11 Jul 2012, 9:57 pm by Rick Hasen
Third, the political calculus explanation posits that the Court uses constitutional avoidance to soften public and Congressional resistance to the Court’s movement of the law in a direction that the Court prefers as a matter of policy. [read post]