Search for: "MATTER OF C B J B"
Results 1421 - 1440
of 3,062
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
8 Nov 2010, 6:31 am
Owen J found that it did (see para. 30 of his judgment), but it may be doubted whether a scheme of this kind for compensating victims of anti-social conduct from public funds was intended to fall within the ambit of the Regulation. [read post]
27 May 2015, 11:59 am
A: 110(2) by the way: very difficult for us in digital education space: mediated instruction activities that use work as integral part of class experience under control of instructor analogous to type of performance that would take place live—really problematic b/c the key learning activities are not the type that would happen live. [read post]
15 Jul 2011, 6:09 am
Finally, copyright infringement claims “necessarily involve[ ] irreparable harm to Plaintiff[ ], as a copyright holder is presumed to suffer irreparable harm as a matter of law” when the ambit of its copyright is invaded. [read post]
15 Jun 2011, 1:00 pm
WILLIAM J. [read post]
22 May 2012, 2:30 am
The contract contained the following provisions on governing law and dispute resolution: (a) the contract is to governed by New York law, with an exclusion of renvoi (Section 12.10(a)); (b) each party accepted the non-exclusive jurisdiction of the courts in New York (Section 12.10(b)) and (c) all disputes shall be settled by arbitration in New York in accordance with the Rules of the American Arbitration Association, without prejudice to the right of any party to make an… [read post]
16 Sep 2011, 2:33 am
Dealing with embodiment of film or recording (3) Subsection (2) is taken never to have applied if an article or thing embodying the film or recording is: (a) sold; or (b) let for hire; or (c) by way of trade offered or exposed for sale or hire; or (d) distributed for the purpose of trade or otherwise; or (e) used for causing the film or recording to be seen or heard in public; or (f) used for broadcasting the film or recording. [read post]
1 Jul 2008, 2:58 pm
Schwab's Behalf. ..................................................... 7 C. [read post]
5 Jul 2011, 1:44 pm
”With this in mind, Arnold J turned his attention to the experts in the case. [read post]
23 May 2021, 7:21 pm
., La Forest J. explained the distinction as follows: [The real and substantial connection] test has the effect of preventing a court from unduly entering into matters in which the jurisdiction in which it is located has little interest. [read post]
17 Jun 2022, 7:23 pm
(c) 2011 - 2022. [read post]
27 Dec 2019, 9:52 am
First, proximate harm is a 12(b)(6) issue and not a subject matter jurisdiction issue, per Lexmark. [read post]
3 Nov 2021, 11:39 am
Rhodes (2021) (Thomas, J., respecting denial of cert.) [read post]
23 Dec 2011, 10:58 am
" Isaiah J. [read post]
16 Nov 2009, 12:32 pm
C. [read post]
20 Dec 2011, 1:51 pm
Cranfill, JudgeRepresenting Appellant (Plaintiff): Patrick J. [read post]
20 Mar 2011, 6:51 am
-Frank B. [read post]
6 Nov 2017, 4:09 pm
Section 9 provides that: The section applies to an action for defamation against a person who is not domiciled (a) in the United Kingdom; (b) in another Member State; or (c) in a state which is for the time being a contracting party to the Lugano Convention. [read post]
30 Oct 2009, 5:37 pm
Di Massa, Jr. and Adrian C. [read post]
15 Jul 2021, 2:26 pm
dziernika 2019 r. w sprawie BGL BNP Paribas SA c/a TeamBank AG Nürnberg (C? [read post]
31 May 2011, 9:00 am
WILLIAM J. [read post]
