Search for: "MATTER OF T F T M M F B M"
Results 1421 - 1440
of 1,598
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
25 Jan 2010, 3:51 am
(IP finance) The UK IP Office issues a Virgin trademark ruling that contrasts the Israel approach (IP Factor) EWHC (Pat): Article 27 (to prevent parallel proceedings in different member states) requires flexible approach to meaning of ‘same parties’: Mölnlycke Health Care AB (MAB), Mölnlycke Health care Limited (MUK) v. [read post]
17 Jan 2010, 11:49 pm
All, essentially, a matter of increasing the cost of doing business. [read post]
13 Jan 2010, 6:37 am
Sheffield Industries, Inc., 514 F. [read post]
10 Jan 2010, 4:13 pm
Co., 516 F.3d 674 (8th Cir. 2008) The Eighth Circuit has ruled in this Minnesota case that a consent judgment that did not allocate between covered and non-covered damages was invalid. [read post]
4 Jan 2010, 6:25 am
That, though, didn’t end the matter. [read post]
2 Jan 2010, 10:45 am
[F**kART - the complete series] As I drank more and lost the plot through an excess of free time, the series expanded. [read post]
28 Dec 2009, 12:02 am
T is for the TV Tax and Local TV Matters marketing campaigns that irritated Canadians from coast to coast. [read post]
25 Dec 2009, 5:53 am
This observation doesn’t appear in the superseding opinion in the case, but that doesn’t matter to us. [read post]
23 Dec 2009, 7:31 am
Recchia, Jr., Joel Rivera, James Sanders, Jr., Larry B. [read post]
21 Dec 2009, 5:34 pm
The taxpayer, Justin M. [read post]
20 Dec 2009, 9:34 am
Jason B. [read post]
14 Dec 2009, 1:00 pm
Simpson is feeling the pain too: [F]or the first 5 months of '09, we are running at 1530 annualized average hours. [read post]
10 Dec 2009, 7:37 pm
McMahon, 360 F.3d 73, 76 (2d Cir. 2004) (reviewing "Rule 41(b) dismissals for abuse of discretion"). [read post]
29 Nov 2009, 10:29 am
As it is a question of fact, ultimately this must be a matter for the court. [read post]
29 Nov 2009, 10:29 am
As it is a question of fact, ultimately this must be a matter for the court. [read post]
16 Nov 2009, 12:32 pm
" 35 USC § 100 (b) definiert "process" als "process, art, or method"; zudem "a new use of a known process, machine, manufacture, composition of matter, or material". [read post]
15 Nov 2009, 6:18 pm
It doesn't matter if the case involves 99 in-state defendants and 1 out-of-state defendant. [read post]
15 Nov 2009, 9:35 am
Robert F. [read post]
13 Nov 2009, 5:15 am
I'm sorry we couldn't do anything. [read post]
10 Nov 2009, 6:53 pm
First, R.C. 2929.19(B)(4)(a), which is codified within the Penalties and Sentencing Chapter, states: “[t]he court shall include in the offender’s sentence a statement that the offender is a tier III sex offender ***. [read post]
